From: david.goulet@polymtl.ca (David Goulet)
Subject: [ltt-dev] UST communication library
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:26:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DF7D1F6.5000402@polymtl.ca> (raw)
Hi everyone,
We are in the process of moving out the UST control library out to lttng-tools
(thus soon deprecating ustctl and usttrace from the UST git tree). However,
there is a common part which is the communication library (libustcomm) where
every command to the tracer and responses are done through a Unix socket using
that specific libs (that contains key functions to pack/unpack data).
So the problem is where this lib should go? Here are the possibilities I've
discussed with Mathieu:
1) Keep libustcomm in UST and linking it in lttng-tools. Cons : direct
dependency! ... not good
2) Move libustcomm in lttng-tools and linking it with UST. Cons: direct
dependency! ... not good
3) Keep libustcomm in UST and dlopen() functions in lttng-tools. For that, we
will need an exported header that contains the symbols. So again... getting some
sort of dependency! (header in UST or git tree)... not good
4) Copy & Paste technique into both trees. REALLY NOT GOOD!
5) Making it a standalone library. So, new git tree, new package and getting it
dependent on lttng-tools and UST.
It seems that the fifth option should be the best idea...
Please any thoughts on that?
Cheers
David
next reply other threads:[~2011-06-14 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-14 21:26 David Goulet [this message]
2011-06-15 5:23 ` Alexandre Montplaisir
2011-06-15 8:09 ` Nils Carlson
2011-06-15 14:57 ` David Goulet
2011-06-15 15:01 ` Yannick Brosseau
2011-06-15 15:16 ` David Goulet
2011-06-15 15:21 ` Yannick Brosseau
2011-06-15 15:24 ` David Goulet
2011-06-15 15:26 ` Yannick Brosseau
2011-06-15 15:41 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-06-15 18:51 ` Alexandre Montplaisir
2011-06-15 15:06 ` Yannick Brosseau
2011-06-15 15:13 ` David Goulet
2011-06-15 15:16 ` Yannick Brosseau
2011-06-15 15:32 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
[not found] ` <BLU0-SMTP5372DAF7E219ACFC9DE44C966B0@phx.gbl>
2011-06-15 15:55 ` Yannick Brosseau
2011-06-15 17:16 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-06-15 19:11 ` Alexandre Montplaisir
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DF7D1F6.5000402@polymtl.ca \
--to=david.goulet@polymtl.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox