From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: pbonzini@redhat.com (Paolo Bonzini)
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 08:14:52 +0200
Subject: [ltt-dev] [URCU RFC patch 2/3] call_rcu: use futex for wakeup
 scheme
In-Reply-To: <BLU0-SMTP38722641CF9CD185CCFFDC96620@phx.gbl>
References: <20110606174558.499172848@efficios.com>
	<20110606175029.073385695@efficios.com>
	<isn6u4$f1v$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<BLU0-SMTP38722641CF9CD185CCFFDC96620@phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <4DF064DC.3040809@redhat.com>

On 06/09/2011 12:31 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Good catch! I missed those parts from the urcu.c wait/wakeup scheme
> (decrement initially, and also set to 0 explicitely when breaking the
> loop without waiting). I just added them with commit
> c768e45ed336970a42e58e679804f0f455422cd8

Yes, looks good.

Paolo