From: matthew.khouzam@ericsson.com (Matthew Khouzam)
Subject: [ltt-dev] Libtraceread sequential reading of events with the same timstamp
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:13:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CF55ACF.7060107@ericsson.com> (raw)
Hello world,
When you have different events in different tracefiles of the same trace
that have the same timestamp, is the order of reading supposed to be
pre-determined?
An example to better illustrate my question.
If at 100ns you have a kernel softIrqEntry and a fs open that occur.
Would you have a prefered order of reading the trace, and could this
affect the state machine.
thanks,
Matthew
next reply other threads:[~2010-11-30 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-30 20:13 Matthew Khouzam [this message]
2010-11-30 20:30 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-11-30 23:18 ` Alexandre Montplaisir
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CF55ACF.7060107@ericsson.com \
--to=matthew.khouzam@ericsson.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox