From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: yannick.brosseau@polymtl.ca (Yannick Brosseau)
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 13:55:48 -0500
Subject: [ltt-dev] Fwd: Bug#604955: ust: FTBFS with binutils-gold
Message-ID: <4CEEB134.6080808@polymtl.ca>

Should we integrate these libs in our LDFLAGS directly?

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Bug#604955: ust: FTBFS with binutils-gold
Resent-Date: 	Thu, 25 Nov 2010 18:09:06 +0000, Thu, 25 Nov 2010 18:09:08 
+0000
Resent-From: 	Bhavani Shankar R <bhavi@ubuntu.com>
Resent-To: 	debian-bugs-dist at lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: 	Jon Bernard <jbernard at debian.org>
Date: 	Thu, 25 Nov 2010 23:35:07 +0530
From: 	Bhavani Shankar R <bhavi@ubuntu.com>
Reply-To: 	Bhavani Shankar R <bhavi at ubuntu.com>, 604955 at bugs.debian.org
To: 	submit at bugs.debian.org



Package: ust
Tags: patch
Usertags: origin-ubuntu natty ubuntu-patch
Severity: important

Hello dear maintainer

Regarding the above subject, Your package FTBFS on ubuntu due to
indirect linking

cf: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ust/0.8-1/+build/2050578/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-natty-amd64.ust_0.8-1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz

The minimal patch below should fix the problem

diff -Nru ust-0.8/debian/rules ust-0.8/debian/rules
--- ust-0.8/debian/rules	2010-11-16 17:24:08.000000000 +0000
+++ ust-0.8/debian/rules	2010-11-18 06:28:44.000000000 +0000
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
  #!/usr/bin/make -f
+
+LDFLAGS+=-lrt -lpthread
+
  %:
  	dh $@


Regards

-- 
Bhavani Shankar.R
https://launchpad.net/~bhavi, a proud ubuntu community developer.
What matters in life is application of mind!,
It makes great sense to have some common sense..!