From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: alexandre.montplaisir@polymtl.ca (Alexandre Montplaisir)
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:38:22 -0500
Subject: [ltt-dev] RFC LTTv TextDump
In-Reply-To: <20101123182653.GA17097@Krystal>
References: <4CEAD092.8020604@polymtl.ca> <20101123182653.GA17097@Krystal>
Message-ID: <4CEC182E.5020805@polymtl.ca>

On 10-11-23 01:26 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Note that the textdump can output content coming from multiple traces,
> where having the trace name in the output for each event becomes
> convenient.
>
> But when we show only one trace, it would not be needed. I'm just saying
> we should not remove it entirely in every cases, because it is sometimes
> needed.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mathieu
>
>

Yeah, I thought about that just after posting. In that case we could 
have the complete trace paths at the start in the header of the file, 
and in the events just a quick fixed-width reference. Something like:


Trace 01 : /home/user/traces/.../trace-alpha
Trace 02 : /tmp/autotrace1

...
channel.eventtype, timestamp, 01, 01, 1000, 1000, Event payload { n = 
42, b = 2 }
...

the numbers representing Trace #1, CPU #1, PID 1000, TGID 1000


Alexandre