From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: pbonzini@redhat.com (Paolo Bonzini)
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 13:27:24 +0100
Subject: [ltt-dev] [PATCH 2/2] introduce uatomic_and and uatomic_or
In-Reply-To: <4CDD31E7.1050500@redhat.com>
References: <1289552247-18130-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>	<1289552247-18130-3-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>	<20101112120846.GB27929@Krystal>
	<4CDD2F69.7020407@redhat.com>	<20101112121900.GA29642@Krystal>
	<4CDD31E7.1050500@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <4CDD32AC.2050308@redhat.com>

On 11/12/2010 01:24 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Should I rename uatomic_add to uatomic_xchg_add too (I prefer this name
> to uatomic_return_add)?

Uh, uatomic_add returns void actually.  Then returning void from 
uatomic_{and,or} is indeed more consistent.

Paolo