From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: alexandre.montplaisir@polymtl.ca (Alexandre Montplaisir)
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:42:24 -0400
Subject: [ltt-dev] LTTV BUG: Recent upgrades broke the JNI interface
In-Reply-To: <20100908210928.GA9441@Krystal>
References: <4C87AC35.8000001@polymtl.ca> <20100908154710.GA12501@Krystal>
	<4C87D9A2.30204@polymtl.ca> <20100908210928.GA9441@Krystal>
Message-ID: <4C880340.50107@polymtl.ca>


>> You don't want a patch that makes the JNI functions access
>> "marker_field->_offset", do you? I can carry it out-of-tree to restore
>> the previous functionality (and compilability (is that a word?)) for
>> TMF, until they change their parser methods, since they'll probably get
>> hit by the same bug as LTTV.
> Please don't do buggy workarounds at the library level to leave TMF
> causy with its current bugs please. They must fix their app to upgrade
> to the newer library version, period. I'm afraid we cannot release the
> TMF package until they do.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mathieu

"Your package is now uploading..."
Ctrl-C, Ctrl-C...

But still, don't you think a mostly working app with a "KNOWN BUGS:" 
disclaimer is better than a completely non-working one? I guess they can 
use an older version, which isn't much better.

Matthew: How long do you think it'd take to get fixed? It will require 
adjustments both in the jni_interface.c and the JniParser.java code in 
TMF, if I remember right.

Cheers,
Alexandre

>> Cheers,
>> Alexandre
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Mathieu
>>>