From: yysu@nec-labs.com (Ya-Yunn Su)
Subject: [ltt-dev] Question about timestamp using textDump module
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:04:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B7195AD.4000506@nec-labs.com> (raw)
Hi,
I'm using lttng on a Xen environment. I applied the lttng patch to
the driver domain kernel and instrumented the driver domain. I have a
question about the timestamp in the textDump output. From my
understanding, the timestamp is in sec.nanosec format, so the difference
between two entries is also in sec.nanosec format. However, if I take
the earlies and latest timestamp within a trace as the duration
(hundreds of thousands second), it is much longer than the actual time I
enable the tracing on (at most a minute). Am I interpreting the
timestamp wrong? Any input is appreciated and thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Ya-Yunn
next reply other threads:[~2010-02-09 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-09 17:04 Ya-Yunn Su [this message]
2010-02-09 17:57 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B7195AD.4000506@nec-labs.com \
--to=yysu@nec-labs.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox