From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: a-tsuji@bk.jp.nec.com (Atsushi Tsuji) Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:21:31 +0900 Subject: [ltt-dev] [PATCH] Fix tracepoints for network socket Message-ID: <4987E26B.2060200@bk.jp.nec.com> Hi, Currently, the tracepoints for network socket could not trace all the network activity due to its location, sock_{send/recv}msg, because there is the path without through sock_{send/recv}msg (like below). Kernel path for sendmsg: sys_write sys_{send/sendto/sendmsg} | | sock_aio_write sock_sendmsg \ / \ / __sock_sendmsg So I think __sock_{send/recv}msg is better tracepoints to track network socket activity. And I'd like to request to get the return value on those tracepoints to track the real size of sending/recieving by user and the error status of __sock_{send/recv}msg. The below patch is for lttng tree to change those tracepoints. Signed-off-by: Atsushi Tsuji --- diff --git a/ltt/probes/net-trace.c b/ltt/probes/net-trace.c index 2c88ec6..34cef1a 100644 --- a/ltt/probes/net-trace.c +++ b/ltt/probes/net-trace.c @@ -79,18 +79,18 @@ void probe_socket_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size, int ret) { trace_mark_tp(net, socket_sendmsg, socket_sendmsg, probe_socket_sendmsg, - "sock %p family %d type %d protocol %d size %zu", + "sock %p family %d type %d protocol %d size %zu ret %d", sock, sock->sk->sk_family, sock->sk->sk_type, - sock->sk->sk_protocol, size); + sock->sk->sk_protocol, size, ret); } void probe_socket_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size, int flags, int ret) { trace_mark_tp(net, socket_recvmsg, socket_recvmsg, probe_socket_recvmsg, - "sock %p family %d type %d protocol %d size %zu", + "sock %p family %d type %d protocol %d size %zu ret %d", sock, sock->sk->sk_family, sock->sk->sk_type, - sock->sk->sk_protocol, size); + sock->sk->sk_protocol, size, ret); } void probe_socket_create(struct socket *sock, int fd) diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c index 2b63bab..e8b2b5d 100644 --- a/net/socket.c +++ b/net/socket.c @@ -567,7 +567,11 @@ static inline int __sock_sendmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock, if (err) return err; - return sock->ops->sendmsg(iocb, sock, msg, size); + err = sock->ops->sendmsg(iocb, sock, msg, size); + trace_socket_sendmsg(sock, msg, size, err); + + return err; + } int sock_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size) @@ -581,7 +585,6 @@ int sock_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size) ret = __sock_sendmsg(&iocb, sock, msg, size); if (-EIOCBQUEUED == ret) ret = wait_on_sync_kiocb(&iocb); - trace_socket_sendmsg(sock, msg, size, ret); return ret; } @@ -650,7 +653,11 @@ static inline int __sock_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock, if (err) return err; - return sock->ops->recvmsg(iocb, sock, msg, size, flags); + err = sock->ops->recvmsg(iocb, sock, msg, size, flags); + trace_socket_recvmsg(sock, msg, size, flags, err); + + return err; + } int sock_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, @@ -666,7 +673,6 @@ int sock_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, ret = __sock_recvmsg(&iocb, sock, msg, size, flags); if (-EIOCBQUEUED == ret) ret = wait_on_sync_kiocb(&iocb); - trace_socket_recvmsg(sock, msg, size, flags, ret); return ret; }