From: Paolo Bonzini via lttng-dev <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: lttng-dev <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>,
rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [lttng-dev] Unexport of kvm_x86_ops vs tracer modules
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 18:24:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3c11308e-006a-a7e9-8482-c6b341690530@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1218866473.10909.1649432186473.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
On 4/8/22 17:36, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> LTTng is an out of tree kernel module, which currently relies on the export.
> Indeed, arch/x86/kvm/x86.c exports a set of tracepoints to kernel modules, e.g.:
>
> EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_entry)
>
> But any probe implementation hooking on that tracepoint would need kvm_x86_ops
> to translate the struct kvm_vcpu * into meaningful tracing data.
>
> I could work-around this on my side in ugly ways, but I would like to discuss
> how kernel module tracers are expected to implement kvm events probes without
> the kvm_x86_ops symbol ?
The conversion is done in the TP_fast_assign snippets, which are part of
kvm.ko and therefore do not need the export. As I understand it, the
issue is that LTTng cannot use the TP_fast_assign snippets, because they
are embedded in the trace_event_raw_event_* symbols?
We cannot do the extraction before calling trace_kvm_exit, because it's
expensive.
Paolo
_______________________________________________
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-08 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-08 15:36 Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2022-04-08 16:24 ` Paolo Bonzini via lttng-dev [this message]
2022-04-08 18:06 ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2022-04-25 13:00 ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2022-04-25 13:28 ` Paolo Bonzini via lttng-dev
2022-04-25 14:04 ` Steven Rostedt via lttng-dev
2022-04-25 16:02 ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2022-04-25 19:13 ` Steven Rostedt via lttng-dev
2022-04-26 6:36 ` Paolo Bonzini via lttng-dev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3c11308e-006a-a7e9-8482-c6b341690530@redhat.com \
--to=lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox