From: Daniel.Thibault@drdc-rddc.gc.ca (Thibault, Daniel)
Subject: [lttng-dev] Odd dependency for lttng-ust - resolved
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:26:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CA1A65C03C1A34C81BBC6272782E696987A7F@valcartierex01.valcartier.drdc-rddc.gc.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5102C77A.5040409@voxpopuli.im>
-----Message d'origine-----
De?: Alexandre Montplaisir [mailto:alexmonthy at voxpopuli.im]
Envoy??: 25 janvier 2013 12:57
On 13-01-25 12:32 PM, Thibault, Daniel wrote:
> [...]
> Until this old gold bug is fixed (which looks unlikely considering its age), maybe each package's configure.ac could be made to explicitly look into /usr/local/lib when /lib and /usr/lib fail? Or the ReadMe files of lttng-ust and lttng-tools could be modified to mention the workaround?
I'm not sure if they are any distro that uses gold by default, instead of the more venerable/tested "ld". I know Ubuntu doesn't.
I think in your case the problem was because you still had the libraries from Ubuntu's older package installed in /usr/lib, and as you mentioned, the linker looks in that location before trying /usr/local/lib. In such a "custom" setup, you would need to override LDFLAGS. But someone that has nothing installed in /usr/lib should get the libraries in /usr/local/lib selected by the linker automatically.
Cheers,
Alexandre
-----Fin du message d'origine-----
Nope, my /usr/lib is clean. The problem is unavoidable on a clean system because lttng-tools's README lists GNU Gold (2.22 or better) in its requirements when building from git. On the other hand, if you had a liburcu package installed and it were not too old, configure's checks would be passed. You could run into trouble during the make though, depending on which liburcu (/usr/lib vs. /usr/local/lib) it linked against. But that scenario is moot as Mathieu rightly warned against mixing old and new stuff together.
"But someone that has nothing installed in /usr/lib should get the libraries in /usr/local/lib selected by the linker automatically." Only if using ld.bfd or if binutils-gold were not installed -in which latter case one would not be following the instructions. (See http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5873516/shared-library-in-usr-local-lib-not-found for a very similar problem and its diagnostic; this is the page that clinched it for me)
Daniel U. Thibault
R & D pour la d?fense Canada - Valcartier (RDDC Valcartier) / Defence R&D Canada - Valcartier (DRDC Valcartier)
Cyber s?curit? pour les missions essentielles (CME) / Mission Critical Cyber Security (MCCS)
Protection des syst?mes et contremesures (PSC) / Systems Protection & Countermeasures (SPC)
2459 route de la Bravoure
Qu?bec, QC G3J 1X5
CANADA
Vox : (418) 844-4000 x4245
Fax : (418) 844-4538
[Valcartier]\\vsi-wdut-o980, [Secteur-SI]\\edge
NAC : 918V QSDJ <http://www.travelgis.com/map.asp?addr=918V%20QSDJ>
Gouvernement du Canada / Government of Canada
<http://www.valcartier.drdc-rddc.gc.ca/>
LinkedIn: <http://ca.linkedin.com/in/daniel-u-thibault/>
Research Gate: <https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Daniel_Thibault/>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-25 18:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-25 17:32 Thibault, Daniel
2013-01-25 17:57 ` Alexandre Montplaisir
2013-01-25 18:26 ` Thibault, Daniel [this message]
2013-01-25 18:48 ` Christian Babeux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3CA1A65C03C1A34C81BBC6272782E696987A7F@valcartierex01.valcartier.drdc-rddc.gc.ca \
--to=daniel.thibault@drdc-rddc.gc.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox