From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: bert.wesarg@googlemail.com (Bert Wesarg)
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:35:38 +0100
Subject: [ltt-dev] [RFC git tree] Userspace RCU (urcu) for Linux (repost)
In-Reply-To: <20090209173427.GC6802@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <20090206030543.GB8560@Krystal> <20090206045841.GA12995@Krystal>
	<20090206130640.GB10918@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<20090206163432.GF10918@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<20090208224419.GA19512@Krystal>
	<20090209041153.GR7120@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<20090209045352.GA28653@Krystal>
	<20090209131653.GS7120@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<36ca99e90902090919r297ad4c3re2248c321b36baf8@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090209173427.GC6802@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <36ca99e90902090935u7fef1cb1g27303e546527e3d8@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 18:34, Paul E. McKenney
<paulmck at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 06:19:45PM +0100, Bert Wesarg wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 14:16, Paul E. McKenney
>> <paulmck at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 11:53:52PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> >> Yes, I guess the signal is not so bad.
>> >
>> > Now if there were a /proc entry that listed out the tids of the
>> > currently running threads, then it might be possible to do something,
>> > especially for applications with many more threads than CPUs.
>>
>> Do you mean something like: `ls /proc/$pid/tasks/*`? Or is this not
>> atomic enough?
>
> Won't that give me all the threads rather than only the ones currently
> running?
What do you mean by 'running'?

Bert
>
>                                                        Thanx, Paul
>