From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: bert.wesarg@googlemail.com (Bert Wesarg)
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:19:45 +0100
Subject: [ltt-dev] [RFC git tree] Userspace RCU (urcu) for Linux (repost)
In-Reply-To: <20090209131653.GS7120@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <20090206030543.GB8560@Krystal> <20090206045841.GA12995@Krystal>
	<20090206130640.GB10918@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<20090206163432.GF10918@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<20090208224419.GA19512@Krystal>
	<20090209041153.GR7120@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<20090209045352.GA28653@Krystal>
	<20090209131653.GS7120@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <36ca99e90902090919r297ad4c3re2248c321b36baf8@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 14:16, Paul E. McKenney
<paulmck at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 11:53:52PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> Yes, I guess the signal is not so bad.
>
> Now if there were a /proc entry that listed out the tids of the
> currently running threads, then it might be possible to do something,
> especially for applications with many more threads than CPUs.
Do you mean something like: `ls /proc/$pid/tasks/*`? Or is this not
atomic enough?

Bert