Re: [lttng-dev] LTTng UST structure support

[chafraysse--- via lttng-dev <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>]

Hi,

So I wrote a draft of Rust lib above ctf-writer, using the apis as demonstrated in the ctf-writer test
For deployment I wanted to use "libbabeltrace2-ctf-writer.so" in the "libbabeltrace2-dev" package but I could not locate the matching includes in there or in the other babeltrace 2 packages
Did I miss them somewhere ? Should I have plugged in at another level in babeltrace2 ?

Best regards,

Charles

----- Mail original -----
De: chafraysse@free.fr
À: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
Envoyé: Lundi 16 Janvier 2023 10:38:28
Objet: Re: [lttng-dev] LTTng UST structure support

Hi Mathieu,

Thanks for your reply :)
I'll stick to bt2 modules in the meantime then
I'll already be saving a ton of time with those and the CTF spec which is great !

Best regards,

Charles

----- Mail original -----
De: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
À: chafraysse@free.fr, lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
Envoyé: Jeudi 12 Janvier 2023 21:10:57
Objet: Re: [lttng-dev] LTTng UST structure support

On 2023-01-09 09:02, chafraysse--- via lttng-dev wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm looking for a CTF writer to serialize instrumentations in an 
> embedded Linux/Rust framework
> LTTng UST looked like a very strong option, but I want to serialize 
> structures as CTF compound type structures and I did not see those 
> supported in the doc or api

This is correct. I am currently working on a new project called 
"libside" (see https://git.efficios.com/?p=libside.git;a=summary) which 
features support for compound types.

However, we still need to do the heavy-lifting implementation work of 
integrating this with LTTng-UST. This is the plan towards supporting 
compound types in LTTng-UST.

> I'd love to have confirmation that I did not just miss something :)
> If LTTng UST is out for me I will probably try to use the ctf-writer 
> module of babeltrace 2 instead

For now the ctf-writer modules of bt2 would be an alternative to 
consider, but remember that it is not designed for low-impact tracing 
such as lttng-ust. So it depends on how much tracer overhead/runtime 
impact you can afford in your use-case.

Thanks,

Mathieu

> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Charles
> _______________________________________________
> lttng-dev mailing list
> lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
> https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com

_______________________________________________
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev