From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id C4aqH24EMmP3egAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 15:58:38 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 738C91E112; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 15:58:38 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=lists.lttng.org header.i=@lists.lttng.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=eUb7ECN1; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from lists.lttng.org (lists.lttng.org [167.114.26.123]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B09581E07B for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 15:58:37 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=lists.lttng.org; s=default; t=1664222317; bh=Kjh5wGYEXkfsFF7g9s2gI73PoidY0JG4Mhs1Kap4zfQ=; h=Date:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=eUb7ECN1XG5PHmfBisdnDvJF77DOZinkOejGntY8mKGlCM6mOIbu5zazOlfiSuNjA J3ruLFIbkTOKUMV94/UIkJjtsmMf/0Nv+TRYJi+7p/gqK6FK0N51x+gvXi5Vn0XTs1 4Iu671o2JzbQc6QoK+GXEB90xCBJRDrtIuM86rrlAi3Pr257JLkUSuD4s0ErJnnymP 35rbtKHQ4AnvNU/tfGLoQigqQEKIgFRArtXDjP21evdNrSZ2FviyxXISGBC9b7dz7Y sA6NjfbCIjxv2L/vDtouLeJKTUj7A/cIQcs/PLAYhRKolNdLkg83aV4yikv2H1eFyc LJ8ApRnnvetpw== Received: from lists-lttng01.efficios.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.lttng.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4MbtqK09Lfz25b9; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 15:58:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dcvr.yhbt.net (dcvr.yhbt.net [173.255.242.215]) by lists.lttng.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4MbtqH6Dyqz25b8 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 15:58:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 571DD1F51E; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 19:58:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 19:58:29 +0000 To: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org Message-ID: <20220926195829.GA10587@dcvr> References: <20220922091536.GA4597@dcvr> <20220923175503.M564483@dcvr> <6db30f66-8237-fef3-d92a-2e36be9efdf6@efficios.com> <20220923220510.M990534@dcvr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [lttng-dev] URCU background threads vs signalfd X-BeenThere: lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: LTTng development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eric Wong via lttng-dev Reply-To: Eric Wong Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: lttng-dev-bounces@lists.lttng.org Sender: "lttng-dev" Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > Do you mind if I fold our 2 patches together with a Co-developed-by tag and > use your Signed-off-by ? Looks good to me, thanks. > Then the question that will arise is whether this change is sufficiently > self-contained that we can push it to stable branches, or if it's master > branch material only. It seems self-contained enough and fixes a real problem encountered in real-world usage, so I think it's suitable for stable. Thanks. _______________________________________________ lttng-dev mailing list lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev