From: jonathan.rajotte-julien@efficios.com (Jonathan Rajotte)
Subject: [lttng-dev] [PATCH lttng-tools v3] Fix: use newly created event filter for condition check
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:24:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190924152417.47028-1-jonathan.rajotte-julien@efficios.com> (raw)
The following commit introduced a regression while
fixing the filter and filter_expression ownership.
commit b0a23296344e57bd2e48e62ec2d7e0d8a38661bb
Author: J?r?mie Galarneau <jeremie.galarneau at efficios.com>
Date: Sat Jan 12 14:53:56 2019 -0500
Fix: leak of filter bytecode and expression on agent event re-enable
The agent subsystem does not properly assume the clean-up of an
event's filter bytecode and expression when a previously disabled
event is re-enabled.
This change ensures that the ownership of both the filter bytecode
and expression is assumed by the agent subsystem and discarded
when a matching event is found.
Steps to reproduce the leak:
$ lttng create
$ lttng enable-event --python allo --filter 'a[42] == 241'
$ lttng disable-event --python allo
$ lttng enable-event --python allo --filter 'a[42] == 241'
Signed-off-by: J?r?mie Galarneau <jeremie.galarneau at efficios.com>
Setting the "filter" object to NULL prevents the call to
add_filter_app_ctx when needed.
We use the filter from the newly created event to
perform the check and the call to add_filter_app_ctx.
Fixes coverity #1399733
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Rajotte <jonathan.rajotte-julien at efficios.com>
---
src/bin/lttng-sessiond/event.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/bin/lttng-sessiond/event.c b/src/bin/lttng-sessiond/event.c
index f32db4429..a8b7646da 100644
--- a/src/bin/lttng-sessiond/event.c
+++ b/src/bin/lttng-sessiond/event.c
@@ -513,8 +513,9 @@ int event_agent_enable(struct ltt_ust_session *usess,
created = 1;
}
- if (created && filter) {
- ret = add_filter_app_ctx(filter, filter_expression, agt);
+ if (created && aevent->filter) {
+ ret = add_filter_app_ctx(
+ aevent->filter, aevent->filter_expression, agt);
if (ret != LTTNG_OK) {
goto error;
}
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2019-09-24 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-24 15:24 Jonathan Rajotte [this message]
2019-09-25 16:41 ` Jérémie Galarneau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190924152417.47028-1-jonathan.rajotte-julien@efficios.com \
--to=jonathan.rajotte-julien@efficios.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox