From: loic.gelle@polymtl.ca (Loïc Gelle)
Subject: [lttng-dev] RFC: More flexible support for UST event collection in containers
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 15:26:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180827152636.Horde.-01OQAaWI7v3hpg9iiRFhuu@www.imp.polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180801173614.Horde.ZvKFlt_4hfXqTXVGAy1Ck_S@www.imp.polymtl.ca>
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1845 bytes --]
Hi all,
Any reactions to my previous message?
Thanks,
Loïc.
Loïc Gelle <loic.gelle at polymtl.ca> a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I am writing a proof of concept for LTTng (ust + tools) for better
> support of application tracing in containers. My point is that we
> should be able to collect all UST events emitted from within
> containers using a single sessiond / consumerd, at least if you want
> to. The main problem to that approach was that the session deamon
> was unable to handle PID clashes when two apps with the same vpid
> tried to register. I fix this by patching the UST client for it to
> declare both its PID and its PID namespace inode number during
> registration (and I also propagated the change to lttng-tools for
> app registration in the hashtable). My patched versions of tools and
> UST are here, in the branch "containers":
>
> https://github.com/loicgelle/lttng-ust
> https://github.com/loicgelle/lttng-tools
>
> One problem that I have now is that LTTng-tools currently uses
> /proc/[pid]/cmdline to fetch the name of each application when
> listing the available tracepoints. This is a problem since we have
> no (simple) way to know the PID of the registered apps in the
> context of the PID namespace of sessiond, so this step basically
> fails. I thought that a fix for this would be to ask the
> applications themselves to declare their name using their dedicated
> socket. Do you think that would be possible and relevant?
>
> Also, if you like the idea that I'm pushing, there is more work
> ahead to make it a feature (for example propagating the changes to
> pid tracking).
>
> Thanks,
> Loïc.
>
> _______________________________________________
> lttng-dev mailing list
> lttng-dev at lists.lttng.org
> https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-27 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-01 17:36 Loïc Gelle
2018-08-27 15:26 ` Loïc Gelle [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180827152636.Horde.-01OQAaWI7v3hpg9iiRFhuu@www.imp.polymtl.ca \
--to=loic.gelle@polymtl.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox