Mirror of the lttng-dev mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Paul E. McKenney)
Subject: [lttng-dev] question about  rcu_bp_exit()
Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 12:53:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160519195308.GX3528@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <971830834.12745.1463596803434.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 06:40:03PM +0000, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> ----- On May 18, 2016, at 5:44 AM, songxin <songxin_1980 at 126.com> wrote: 
> 
> > Hi,
> > Now I get a crash because receiving signal SIGSEGV as below.
> 
> > #0 arena_alloc (arena=<optimized out>) at
> > /usr/src/debug/liburcu/0.9.1+git5fd33b1e5003ca316bd314ec3fd1447f6199a282-r0/git/urcu-bp.c:432
> > #1 add_thread () at
> > /usr/src/debug/liburcu/0.9.1+git5fd33b1e5003ca316bd314ec3fd1447f6199a282-r0/git/urcu-bp.c:462
> > #2 rcu_bp_register () at
> > /usr/src/debug/liburcu/0.9.1+git5fd33b1e5003ca316bd314ec3fd1447f6199a282-r0/git/urcu-bp.c:541
> 
> > I read the code of urcu-bp.c and found that "if (chunk->data_len - chunk->used <
> > len)" is in 432 line. So I guess that the chunk is a illegal pointer.
> > Below is the function rcu_bp_exit().
> 
> > static
> > void rcu_bp_exit(void)
> > {
> > mutex_lock(&init_lock);
> > if (!--rcu_bp_refcount) {
> > struct registry_chunk *chunk, *tmp;
> > int ret;
> 
> > cds_list_for_each_entry_safe(chunk, tmp,
> > &registry_arena.chunk_list, node) {
> > munmap(chunk, chunk->data_len
> > + sizeof(struct registry_chunk));
> > }
> > ret = pthread_key_delete(urcu_bp_key);
> > if (ret)
> > abort();
> > }
> > mutex_unlock(&init_lock);
> > }
> 
> > My question is below.
> > Why did not delete the chunk from registry_arena.chunk_list before munmap a
> > chunk?
> 
> It is not expected that any thread would be created after the execution of 
> rcu_bp_exit() as a library destructor. Does re-initializing the chunk_list after 
> iterating on it within rcu_bp_exit() fix your issue ? 
> 
> I'm curious about your use-case for creating threads after the library destructor 
> has run. 

I am with Mathieu on this -- not much good can be expected using things
after their cleanup.  Though I suppose that, given a sufficient use case,
there could at least in theory be an option for manual control of cleanup.

							Thanx, Paul



      reply	other threads:[~2016-05-19 19:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <6db07fb4.c6e5.154c340296f.Coremail.songxin_1980@126.com>
2016-05-18 18:40 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2016-05-19 19:53   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160519195308.GX3528@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox