From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: jbernard@debian.org (Jon Bernard)
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 21:58:15 -0400
Subject: [lttng-dev] Query about LTTng 2.0 Debian packages
In-Reply-To: <20120621191452.GA18195@quintessa>
References: <20120621012622.GA1387@Krystal> <20120621191452.GA18195@quintessa>
Message-ID: <20120629015815.GA22800@quintessa>

* Jon Bernard <jbernard at debian.org> wrote:
> * Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com> wrote:
> > Hi Jon,
> > 
> > I wanted to get in touch with you regarding LTTng 2.0 Debian packages.
> > Is there anything we can do to help you getting those packages into
> > Debian ? They have been out for a while now, and even Ubuntu picked them
> > up. I understand that you are probably busy, hence my offer for help.
> 
> I've just uploaded another package I've been working on and LTTng 2.0 packages
> are next on my list. Give me a few days to get things sorted, I'll post an
> update next week with my status.

Is the 2.0 series indented to replace the existing UST, or should they be able
to exist side-by-side?  I'm inclined to think the new packages should replace
the old ones, and thus prevent a user from having both installed at the same
time, but wanted to check first.

URCU is updated and I'm looking at UST/CTL now. I'll file ITPs for babeltrace
and modules in the morning.

-- 
Jon