From: mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com (Mathieu Desnoyers)
Subject: [lttng-dev] [RFC] Userspace RCU library internal error handling
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:41:13 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120621164113.GA21197@Krystal> (raw)
Hi,
Currently, liburcu calls "exit(-1)" upon internal consistency error.
This is not pretty, and usually frowned upon in libraries.
One example of failure path where we use this is if pthread_mutex_lock()
would happen to fail within synchronize_rcu(). Clearly, this should
_never_ happen: it would typically be triggered only by memory
corruption (or other terrible things like that). That being said, we
clearly don't want to make "synchronize_rcu()" return errors like that
to the application, because it would complexify the application error
handling needlessly.
So instead of calling exit(-1), one possibility would be to do something
like this:
#include <signal.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#define urcu_die(fmt, ...) \
do { \
fprintf(stderr, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
(void) pthread_kill(pthread_self(), SIGBUS); \
} while (0)
and call urcu_die(); in those "unrecoverable error" cases, instead of
calling exit(-1). Therefore, if an application chooses to trap those
signals, it can, which is otherwise not possible with a direct call to
exit().
Thoughts ?
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
next reply other threads:[~2012-06-21 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-21 16:41 Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2012-06-21 16:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-21 18:59 ` [lttng-dev] [rp] " Josh Triplett
2012-06-21 19:03 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-06-21 19:14 ` [lttng-dev] [RFC PATCH] " Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-06-21 19:28 ` [lttng-dev] [rp] [RFC] " Josh Triplett
2012-06-21 19:48 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-06-21 21:21 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-22 15:22 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-06-22 19:55 ` Josh Triplett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120621164113.GA21197@Krystal \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox