Mirror of the lttng-dev mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com (Mathieu Desnoyers)
Subject: [lttng-dev] -warn-common with lttng-ust 2.0.2
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 13:17:28 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120608171728.GA22579@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FD11C7E.7060303@mentor.com>

* Hollis Blanchard (hollis_blanchard at mentor.com) wrote:
> Hi, I was adding an LTTng UST 2.0 tracepoint to an application that uses  
> -warn-common (see http://www.math.utah.edu/docs/info/ld_2.html). I  
> created a simple tracepoint, had lttng-gen-tp produce tracepoints.o,  
> then linked that to the application, along with -llttng-ust. This  
> results in some warnings:
>
> tracepoints.o: warning: common of `handle' overridden by definition
> /usr/local/lib/liblttng-ust.so: warning: defined here
> tracepoints.o: warning: common of `lttng_client_callbacks_overwrite' overridden by definition
> /usr/local/lib/liblttng-ust.so: warning: defined here
> tracepoints.o: warning: common of `lttng_client_callbacks_discard' overridden by definition
> /usr/local/lib/liblttng-ust.so: warning: defined here
> tracepoints.o: warning: common of `lttng_client_callbacks_metadata' overridden by definition
> /usr/local/lib/liblttng-ust.so: warning: defined here
> /usr/local/lib/liblttng-ust-tracepoint.so.0: warning: multiple common of `handle'
> tracepoints.o: warning: previous common is here
>
> This seems to be a valid warning. The LTTng UST headers contain  
> definitions like this in include/lttng/ringbuffer-config.h:
> struct lttng_ust_shm_handle *handle;
>
> If two objects use that header, each will get a copy of "handle", right?

Thanks for reporting, fixed by master commit:


commit 5a821cd6258af4b44aac352bd89b715377cee7d2
Author: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com>
Date:   Fri Jun 8 13:17:05 2012 -0400

    Fix: don't define variables in headers
    
    From Hollis Blanchard <hollis_blanchard at mentor.com>:
    > Hi, I was adding an LTTng UST 2.0 tracepoint to an application that uses
    > -warn-common (see http://www.math.utah.edu/docs/info/ld_2.html). I created
    > a simple tracepoint, had lttng-gen-tp produce tracepoints.o, then linked
    > that to the application, along with -llttng-ust. This results in some
    > warnings:
    >
    > tracepoints.o: warning: common of `handle' overridden by definition
    > /usr/local/lib/liblttng-ust.so: warning: defined here
    > tracepoints.o: warning: common of `lttng_client_callbacks_overwrite' overridden
    > +by definition
    > /usr/local/lib/liblttng-ust.so: warning: defined here
    > tracepoints.o: warning: common of `lttng_client_callbacks_discard' overridden by
    > +definition
    > /usr/local/lib/liblttng-ust.so: warning: defined here
    > tracepoints.o: warning: common of `lttng_client_callbacks_metadata' overridden
    > +by definition
    > /usr/local/lib/liblttng-ust.so: warning: defined here
    > /usr/local/lib/liblttng-ust-tracepoint.so.0: warning: multiple common of
    > +`handle'
    > tracepoints.o: warning: previous common is here
    >
    > This seems to be a valid warning. The LTTng UST headers contain
    > definitions like this in include/lttng/ringbuffer-config.h:
    > struct lttng_ust_shm_handle *handle;
    >
    > If two objects use that header, each will get a copy of "handle", right?
    
    handle: This was meant to be a forward declaration of
    
      struct lttng_ust_shm_handle
    
    so just removing the "*handle" part. This can be considered as a
    cleanup (or a fix without actual runtime effect).
    
    lttng_client_callbacks_*: if the cb values would have been used in the
    consumer daemon, this would have caused an issue: these would be set to
    NULL instead of the actual callback pointers. So in a way this is a fix,
    but it does not have any runtime impact at this point.
    
    Reported-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollis_blanchard at mentor.com>
    Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com>



-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com



      reply	other threads:[~2012-06-08 17:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-07 21:26 Hollis Blanchard
2012-06-08 17:17 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120608171728.GA22579@Krystal \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox