From: mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com (Mathieu Desnoyers)
Subject: [lttng-dev] -warn-common with lttng-ust 2.0.2
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 13:17:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120608171728.GA22579@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FD11C7E.7060303@mentor.com>
* Hollis Blanchard (hollis_blanchard at mentor.com) wrote:
> Hi, I was adding an LTTng UST 2.0 tracepoint to an application that uses
> -warn-common (see http://www.math.utah.edu/docs/info/ld_2.html). I
> created a simple tracepoint, had lttng-gen-tp produce tracepoints.o,
> then linked that to the application, along with -llttng-ust. This
> results in some warnings:
>
> tracepoints.o: warning: common of `handle' overridden by definition
> /usr/local/lib/liblttng-ust.so: warning: defined here
> tracepoints.o: warning: common of `lttng_client_callbacks_overwrite' overridden by definition
> /usr/local/lib/liblttng-ust.so: warning: defined here
> tracepoints.o: warning: common of `lttng_client_callbacks_discard' overridden by definition
> /usr/local/lib/liblttng-ust.so: warning: defined here
> tracepoints.o: warning: common of `lttng_client_callbacks_metadata' overridden by definition
> /usr/local/lib/liblttng-ust.so: warning: defined here
> /usr/local/lib/liblttng-ust-tracepoint.so.0: warning: multiple common of `handle'
> tracepoints.o: warning: previous common is here
>
> This seems to be a valid warning. The LTTng UST headers contain
> definitions like this in include/lttng/ringbuffer-config.h:
> struct lttng_ust_shm_handle *handle;
>
> If two objects use that header, each will get a copy of "handle", right?
Thanks for reporting, fixed by master commit:
commit 5a821cd6258af4b44aac352bd89b715377cee7d2
Author: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com>
Date: Fri Jun 8 13:17:05 2012 -0400
Fix: don't define variables in headers
From Hollis Blanchard <hollis_blanchard at mentor.com>:
> Hi, I was adding an LTTng UST 2.0 tracepoint to an application that uses
> -warn-common (see http://www.math.utah.edu/docs/info/ld_2.html). I created
> a simple tracepoint, had lttng-gen-tp produce tracepoints.o, then linked
> that to the application, along with -llttng-ust. This results in some
> warnings:
>
> tracepoints.o: warning: common of `handle' overridden by definition
> /usr/local/lib/liblttng-ust.so: warning: defined here
> tracepoints.o: warning: common of `lttng_client_callbacks_overwrite' overridden
> +by definition
> /usr/local/lib/liblttng-ust.so: warning: defined here
> tracepoints.o: warning: common of `lttng_client_callbacks_discard' overridden by
> +definition
> /usr/local/lib/liblttng-ust.so: warning: defined here
> tracepoints.o: warning: common of `lttng_client_callbacks_metadata' overridden
> +by definition
> /usr/local/lib/liblttng-ust.so: warning: defined here
> /usr/local/lib/liblttng-ust-tracepoint.so.0: warning: multiple common of
> +`handle'
> tracepoints.o: warning: previous common is here
>
> This seems to be a valid warning. The LTTng UST headers contain
> definitions like this in include/lttng/ringbuffer-config.h:
> struct lttng_ust_shm_handle *handle;
>
> If two objects use that header, each will get a copy of "handle", right?
handle: This was meant to be a forward declaration of
struct lttng_ust_shm_handle
so just removing the "*handle" part. This can be considered as a
cleanup (or a fix without actual runtime effect).
lttng_client_callbacks_*: if the cb values would have been used in the
consumer daemon, this would have caused an issue: these would be set to
NULL instead of the actual callback pointers. So in a way this is a fix,
but it does not have any runtime impact at this point.
Reported-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollis_blanchard at mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com>
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-08 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-07 21:26 Hollis Blanchard
2012-06-08 17:17 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120608171728.GA22579@Krystal \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox