From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com (Mathieu Desnoyers)
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 09:19:41 -0400
Subject: [lttng-dev] Required Kernel
In-Reply-To: <4F7AF80F.5000801@polymtl.ca>
References: <OFA2272A42.255EC4C4-ON882579D4.0077F803-882579D4.007841CD@selinc.com>
	<4F7AF093.7010804@gmail.com> <20120403125948.GD14534@Krystal>
	<4F7AF80F.5000801@polymtl.ca>
Message-ID: <20120403131941.GA15166@Krystal>

* Alexandre Montplaisir (alexandre.montplaisir at polymtl.ca) wrote:
> On 12-04-03 08:59 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > We should probably put a kernel version compability matrix,
> 
> Oh god, please, no...
> I'm still having nightmares from 
> http://git.lttng.org/?p=lttv.git;a=blob_plain;f=doc/developer/lttng-lttv-compatibility.html;hb=HEAD
> 
> ;)
> 
> 
> Granted, the minimum requirement could be advertised a bit more
> prominently (on the lttng2.0 page for example).

OK.

> 
> Also, I remember someone being able to run it on 2.6.35 by backporting 1
> or 2 kernel patches. Perhaps it'd be worth re-testing and documenting
> this procedure somewhere?

Yes, Yannick probably still has the patches.

Thanks,

Mathieu

> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> -- 
> Alexandre Montplaisir
> DORSAL lab,
> ?cole Polytechnique de Montr?al
> 

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com