From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com (Mathieu Desnoyers) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 01:50:35 -0500 Subject: [ltt-dev] [PATCH 01/10 round10] introduce bucket_at() and improve readability In-Reply-To: <4ECC93D5.9040202@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <1321426105-24303-1-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> <1321426105-24303-2-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> <20111122095851.GB8332@Krystal> <4ECC93D5.9040202@cn.fujitsu.com> Message-ID: <20111123065035.GB19538@Krystal> * Lai Jiangshan (laijs at cn.fujitsu.com) wrote: > On 11/22/2011 05:58 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > * Lai Jiangshan (laijs at cn.fujitsu.com) wrote: > >> Fast path is not changed. > >> It will slow down very little for slow path. > > > > it cleans up the code, so it's generally fine with me. There is just one > > part that I don't understand, see below, > > > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan > >> --- > >> rculfhash.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------- > >> 1 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/rculfhash.c b/rculfhash.c > >> index bda3bd6..b0c7de5 100644 > >> --- a/rculfhash.c > >> +++ b/rculfhash.c > >> @@ -755,18 +755,14 @@ unsigned long _uatomic_xchg_monotonic_increase(unsigned long *ptr, > >> return old2; > >> } > >> > >> -static > >> -struct cds_lfht_node *lookup_bucket(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long size, > >> - unsigned long hash) > >> +static inline > >> +struct cds_lfht_node *bucket_at(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long index) > >> { > >> - unsigned long index, order; > >> - > >> - assert(size > 0); > >> - index = hash & (size - 1); > >> + unsigned long order; > >> > >> - if (index < ht->min_alloc_size) { > >> - dbg_printf("lookup hash %lu index %lu order 0 aridx 0\n", > >> - hash, index); > >> + if ((__builtin_constant_p(index) && index == 0) > >> + || index < ht->min_alloc_size) { > >> + dbg_printf("bucket index %lu order 0 aridx 0\n", index); > >> return &ht->t.tbl[0]->nodes[index]; > >> } > >> /* > >> @@ -775,11 +771,19 @@ struct cds_lfht_node *lookup_bucket(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long size, > >> * get_count_order_ulong. > >> */ > >> order = fls_ulong(index); > >> - dbg_printf("lookup hash %lu index %lu order %lu aridx %lu\n", > >> - hash, index, order, index & ((1UL << (order - 1)) - 1)); > >> + dbg_printf("bucket index %lu order %lu aridx %lu\n", > >> + index, order, index & ((1UL << (order - 1)) - 1)); > >> return &ht->t.tbl[order]->nodes[index & ((1UL << (order - 1)) - 1)]; > >> } > >> > >> +static inline > >> +struct cds_lfht_node *lookup_bucket(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long size, > >> + unsigned long hash) > >> +{ > >> + assert(size > 0); > >> + return bucket_at(ht, hash & (size - 1)); > >> +} > >> + > >> /* > >> * Remove all logically deleted nodes from a bucket up to a certain node key. > >> */ > >> @@ -1105,19 +1109,18 @@ static > >> void init_table_populate_partition(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long i, > >> unsigned long start, unsigned long len) > >> { > >> - unsigned long j; > >> + unsigned long j, size = 1UL << (i - 1); > >> > >> assert(i > ht->min_alloc_order); > >> ht->cds_lfht_rcu_read_lock(); > >> - for (j = start; j < start + len; j++) { > >> - struct cds_lfht_node *new_node = &ht->t.tbl[i]->nodes[j]; > >> - > >> - dbg_printf("init populate: i %lu j %lu hash %lu\n", > >> - i, j, (1UL << (i - 1)) + j); > >> - new_node->reverse_hash = > >> - bit_reverse_ulong((1UL << (i - 1)) + j); > >> - _cds_lfht_add(ht, NULL, NULL, 1UL << (i - 1), > >> - new_node, NULL, 1); > >> + for (j = start + size; j < size + start + len; j++) { > > > > Please use "j = size + start; j < size + start + len;" > > > >> + struct cds_lfht_node *new_node = bucket_at(ht, j); > >> + > >> + assert(j >= size && j < (size << 1)); > >> + dbg_printf("init populate: order %lu index %lu hash %lu\n", > >> + i, j, j); > >> + new_node->reverse_hash = bit_reverse_ulong(j); > >> + _cds_lfht_add(ht, NULL, NULL, size, new_node, NULL, 1); > >> } > >> ht->cds_lfht_rcu_read_unlock(); > >> } > >> @@ -1205,18 +1208,18 @@ static > >> void remove_table_partition(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long i, > >> unsigned long start, unsigned long len) > >> { > >> - unsigned long j; > >> + unsigned long j, size = 1UL << (i - 1); > >> > >> assert(i > ht->min_alloc_order); > >> ht->cds_lfht_rcu_read_lock(); > >> - for (j = start; j < start + len; j++) { > >> - struct cds_lfht_node *fini_node = &ht->t.tbl[i]->nodes[j]; > >> - > >> - dbg_printf("remove entry: i %lu j %lu hash %lu\n", > >> - i, j, (1UL << (i - 1)) + j); > >> - fini_node->reverse_hash = > >> - bit_reverse_ulong((1UL << (i - 1)) + j); > >> - (void) _cds_lfht_del(ht, 1UL << (i - 1), fini_node, 1); > >> + for (j = size + start; j < size + start + len; j++) { > >> + struct cds_lfht_node *fini_node = bucket_at(ht, j); > >> + > >> + assert(j >= size && j < (size << 1)); > >> + dbg_printf("remove entry: order %lu index %lu hash %lu\n", > >> + i, j, j); > >> + fini_node->reverse_hash = bit_reverse_ulong(j); > >> + (void) _cds_lfht_del(ht, size, fini_node, 1); > >> } > >> ht->cds_lfht_rcu_read_unlock(); > >> } > >> @@ -1293,14 +1296,15 @@ static > >> void cds_lfht_create_bucket(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long size) > >> { > >> struct cds_lfht_node *prev, *node; > >> - unsigned long order, len, i, j; > >> + unsigned long order, len, i; > >> > >> ht->t.tbl[0] = calloc(1, ht->min_alloc_size * sizeof(struct cds_lfht_node)); > >> assert(ht->t.tbl[0]); > >> > >> - dbg_printf("create bucket: order %lu index %lu hash %lu\n", 0, 0, 0); > >> - ht->t.tbl[0]->nodes[0].next = flag_bucket(get_end()); > >> - ht->t.tbl[0]->nodes[0].reverse_hash = 0; > >> + dbg_printf("create bucket: order 0 index 0 hash 0\n"); > >> + node = bucket_at(ht, 0); > >> + node->next = flag_bucket(get_end()); > >> + node->reverse_hash = 0; > >> > >> for (order = 1; order < get_count_order_ulong(size) + 1; order++) { > >> len = 1UL << (order - 1); > >> @@ -1311,22 +1315,15 @@ void cds_lfht_create_bucket(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long size) > >> assert(ht->t.tbl[order]); > >> } > >> > > > > below is the change I fail to understand. I think I'd need to be walked > > through this change with an explanation, which could be added as a > > comment telling what this function is doing. > > The "if else if" code simulates the code of "set prev as the bucket with index=i". > it is "bucket_at(ht, i)". > > Now, we are trying to init the node with the hash=(i+len) (which is also > a bucket with index=(i+len)) to the hash table, so this node has to be inserted > after the bucket with index=i. And because there is no other non-bucket node > nor bucket node with larger index inserted, so the bucket node with index=(i+len) > should be inserted directly linked after the bucket node with index=i. > Sounds like a very reasonable explanation to me. Please add this as a comment block above the function. Thanks! Mathieu > > > > >> - i = 0; > >> - prev = ht->t.tbl[i]->nodes; > >> - for (j = 0; j < len; j++) { > >> - if (j & (j - 1)) { /* Between power of 2 */ > >> - prev++; > >> - } else if (j) { /* At each power of 2 */ > >> - i++; > >> - prev = ht->t.tbl[i]->nodes; > >> - } > >> + for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { > >> + prev = bucket_at(ht, i); > >> + node = bucket_at(ht, i + len); > > > > -- Mathieu Desnoyers Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com