Mirror of the lttng-dev mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com (Mathieu Desnoyers)
Subject: [ltt-dev] [PATCH 02/10 round10] proper wrapper for bucket table alloc	and free
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:01:14 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111122100114.GC8332@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1321426105-24303-3-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

* Lai Jiangshan (laijs at cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs at cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  rculfhash.c |   78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  1 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/rculfhash.c b/rculfhash.c
> index b0c7de5..c7f993f 100644
> --- a/rculfhash.c
> +++ b/rculfhash.c
> @@ -755,6 +755,36 @@ unsigned long _uatomic_xchg_monotonic_increase(unsigned long *ptr,
>  	return old2;
>  }
>  
> +static
> +void cds_lfht_alloc_bucket_table(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long order)
> +{
> +	if (order == 0) {
> +		ht->t.tbl[0] = calloc(ht->min_alloc_size,
> +			sizeof(struct cds_lfht_node));
> +		assert(ht->t.tbl[0]);
> +	} else if (order > ht->min_alloc_order) {
> +		ht->t.tbl[order] = calloc(1UL << (order -1),
> +			sizeof(struct cds_lfht_node));
> +		assert(ht->t.tbl[order]);
> +	}
> +	/* Nothing to do for 0 < order && order <= ht->min_alloc_order */
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * cds_lfht_free_bucket_table() should be called with decreasing order.
> + * When cds_lfht_free_bucket_table(0) is called, it means the whole
> + * lfht is destroyed.
> + */
> +static
> +void cds_lfht_free_bucket_table(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long order)
> +{
> +	if (order == 0)
> +		poison_free(ht->t.tbl[0]);
> +	else if (order > ht->min_alloc_order)
> +		poison_free(ht->t.tbl[order]);
> +	/* Nothing to do for 0 < order && order <= ht->min_alloc_order */
> +}
> +
>  static inline
>  struct cds_lfht_node *bucket_at(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long index)
>  {
> @@ -1158,8 +1188,7 @@ void init_table(struct cds_lfht *ht,
>  		if (CMM_LOAD_SHARED(ht->t.resize_target) < (1UL << i))
>  			break;
>  
> -		ht->t.tbl[i] = calloc(1, len * sizeof(struct cds_lfht_node));
> -		assert(ht->t.tbl[i]);
> +		cds_lfht_alloc_bucket_table(ht, i);
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * Set all bucket nodes reverse hash values for a level and
> @@ -1243,7 +1272,7 @@ void fini_table(struct cds_lfht *ht,
>  		unsigned long first_order, unsigned long last_order)
>  {
>  	long i;
> -	void *free_by_rcu = NULL;
> +	unsigned long free_by_rcu_order = 0;
>  
>  	dbg_printf("fini table: first_order %lu last_order %lu\n",
>  		   first_order, last_order);
> @@ -1268,8 +1297,8 @@ void fini_table(struct cds_lfht *ht,
>  		 * return a logically removed node as insert position.
>  		 */
>  		ht->cds_lfht_synchronize_rcu();
> -		if (free_by_rcu)
> -			free(free_by_rcu);
> +		if (free_by_rcu_order)
> +			cds_lfht_free_bucket_table(ht, free_by_rcu_order);
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * Set "removed" flag in bucket nodes about to be removed.
> @@ -1279,16 +1308,16 @@ void fini_table(struct cds_lfht *ht,
>  		 */
>  		remove_table(ht, i, len);
>  
> -		free_by_rcu = ht->t.tbl[i];
> +		free_by_rcu_order = i;

Hrm, so for i = 0 (order 0), we never call free() ?

Thanks,

Mathieu

>  
>  		dbg_printf("fini new size: %lu\n", 1UL << i);
>  		if (CMM_LOAD_SHARED(ht->in_progress_destroy))
>  			break;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (free_by_rcu) {
> +	if (free_by_rcu_order) {
>  		ht->cds_lfht_synchronize_rcu();
> -		free(free_by_rcu);
> +		cds_lfht_free_bucket_table(ht, free_by_rcu_order);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -1298,8 +1327,7 @@ void cds_lfht_create_bucket(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long size)
>  	struct cds_lfht_node *prev, *node;
>  	unsigned long order, len, i;
>  
> -	ht->t.tbl[0] = calloc(1, ht->min_alloc_size * sizeof(struct cds_lfht_node));
> -	assert(ht->t.tbl[0]);
> +	cds_lfht_alloc_bucket_table(ht, 0);
>  
>  	dbg_printf("create bucket: order 0 index 0 hash 0\n");
>  	node = bucket_at(ht, 0);
> @@ -1308,12 +1336,7 @@ void cds_lfht_create_bucket(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long size)
>  
>  	for (order = 1; order < get_count_order_ulong(size) + 1; order++) {
>  		len = 1UL << (order - 1);
> -		if (order <= ht->min_alloc_order) {
> -			ht->t.tbl[order] = (struct rcu_level *) (ht->t.tbl[0]->nodes + len);
> -		} else {
> -			ht->t.tbl[order] = calloc(1, len * sizeof(struct cds_lfht_node));
> -			assert(ht->t.tbl[order]);
> -		}
> +		cds_lfht_alloc_bucket_table(ht, order);
>  
>  		for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
>  			prev = bucket_at(ht, i);
> @@ -1576,23 +1599,16 @@ int cds_lfht_delete_bucket(struct cds_lfht *ht)
>  	 */
>  	size = ht->t.size;
>  	/* Internal sanity check: all nodes left should be bucket */
> -	for (order = 0; order < get_count_order_ulong(size) + 1; order++) {
> -		unsigned long len;
> +	for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
> +		node = bucket_at(ht, i);
> +		dbg_printf("delete bucket: index %lu expected hash %lu hash %lu\n",
> +			i, i, bit_reverse_ulong(node->reverse_hash));
> +		assert(is_bucket(node->next));
> +	}
>  
> -		len = !order ? 1 : 1UL << (order - 1);
> -		for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> -			dbg_printf("delete order %lu i %lu hash %lu\n",
> -				order, i,
> -				bit_reverse_ulong(ht->t.tbl[order]->nodes[i].reverse_hash));
> -			assert(is_bucket(ht->t.tbl[order]->nodes[i].next));
> -		}
> +	for (order = get_count_order_ulong(size); (long)order >= 0; order--)
> +		cds_lfht_free_bucket_table(ht, order);
>  
> -		if (order == ht->min_alloc_order)
> -			poison_free(ht->t.tbl[0]);
> -		else if (order > ht->min_alloc_order)
> -			poison_free(ht->t.tbl[order]);
> -		/* Nothing to delete for order < ht->min_alloc_order */
> -	}
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.4.4
> 

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com




  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-22 10:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-16  6:48 [ltt-dev] [PATCH 00/10 round10] rculfhash memory managements Lai Jiangshan
2011-11-16  6:48 ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 01/10 round10] introduce bucket_at() and improve readability Lai Jiangshan
2011-11-22  9:58   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-11-23  6:33     ` Lai Jiangshan
2011-11-23  6:50       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-11-16  6:48 ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 02/10 round10] proper wrapper for bucket table alloc and free Lai Jiangshan
2011-11-22 10:01   ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2011-11-23  6:36     ` Lai Jiangshan
2011-11-23  6:49       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-11-16  6:48 ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 03/10 round10] ht->t.size is no required larger than ht->min_table_size now Lai Jiangshan
2011-11-22 10:06   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-11-23  7:05     ` Lai Jiangshan
2011-11-23  7:17       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-11-16  6:48 ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 04/10 round10] remove struct rcu_level Lai Jiangshan
2011-11-22 10:08   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-11-16  6:48 ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 05/10 round10] add max_size arguemnt Lai Jiangshan
2011-11-22 10:11   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-11-23  7:13     ` Lai Jiangshan
2011-11-23  7:15       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-11-16  6:48 ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 06/10 round10] add LFHT_MEMORY_CHUNK low level memory management Lai Jiangshan
2011-11-22 10:20   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-11-23  6:05     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-11-23  8:11     ` Lai Jiangshan
2011-11-23  9:21       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-11-16  6:48 ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 07/10 round10] add LFHT_MEMORY_RESERVED " Lai Jiangshan
2011-11-17  2:15   ` Lai Jiangshan
2011-11-22 10:25   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-11-16  6:48 ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 08/10 round10] comments for " Lai Jiangshan
2011-11-16  6:48 ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 09/10 round10] fix comments of cds_lfht_new() Lai Jiangshan
2011-11-23  5:46   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-11-16  6:48 ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 10/10 round10] add my name Lai Jiangshan
2011-11-23  5:48   ` Mathieu Desnoyers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111122100114.GC8332@Krystal \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox