From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Paul E. McKenney) Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:27:21 -0700 Subject: [ltt-dev] [PATCH 5/7] urcu, call_rcu: avoid create call_rcu_data for child when unneed In-Reply-To: <061a717cef1fd918d0a2a95b142e51a2c5a85ff5.1317198301.git.laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <061a717cef1fd918d0a2a95b142e51a2c5a85ff5.1317198301.git.laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Message-ID: <20110929172721.GB2362@linux.vnet.ibm.com> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 04:34:31PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan Nice optimization!!! Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney > --- > urcu-call-rcu-impl.h | 4 ++++ > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/urcu-call-rcu-impl.h b/urcu-call-rcu-impl.h > index 87d9157..65c1c7a 100644 > --- a/urcu-call-rcu-impl.h > +++ b/urcu-call-rcu-impl.h > @@ -675,6 +675,10 @@ void call_rcu_after_fork_child(void) > /* Release the mutex. */ > call_rcu_unlock(&call_rcu_mutex); > > + /* Do nothing when call_rcu() has not been used */ > + if (cds_list_empty(&call_rcu_data_list)) > + return; > + > /* > * Allocate a new default call_rcu_data structure in order > * to get a working call_rcu thread to go with it. > -- > 1.7.4.4 >