From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com (Mathieu Desnoyers)
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:29:39 -0500
Subject: [ltt-dev] [UST PATCH] Allow backward compatibility to ustctl	<=
	0.11 for some commands
In-Reply-To: <4D66BB64.7000009@windriver.com>
References: <1298562404-20669-1-git-send-email-jason.wessel@windriver.com>
	<066CB591-C1F3-4E5F-8F04-349ACD9B1CEC@ludd.ltu.se>
	<4D66BB64.7000009@windriver.com>
Message-ID: <20110224222939.GA19417@Krystal>

* Jason Wessel (jason.wessel at windriver.com) wrote:
> On 02/24/2011 01:59 PM, Nils Carlson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Any reason you want to ifdef these? The idea with the new api was to  
> > make it nicer, but I wouldn't mind being backwards compatible as well.
> >
> > If its ok with you I can pull this patch tomorrow and remove the  
> > #ifdefs?
> >
> 
> 
> I put the #ifdef's in to show that it is cleanly implemented as per the requirement of Mathieu.
> 
> I'll gladly send another patch with the #ifdef's removed and move the allocation of "int i" up with the other variables.

That's fine with me, and it would still be clean enough. ;)

Thanks!

Mathieu

> 
> Jason.

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com