Mirror of the lttng-dev mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: compudj@krystal.dyndns.org (Mathieu Desnoyers)
Subject: [ltt-dev] Kernel and User Space tracers have different	timestamp reference
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 08:32:57 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101126133256.GA22133@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CEFB138.6030409@polymtl.ca>

Hi!

Yesterday evening, Julien and I were actively finishing the vDSO work
that is needed to have synchronized timestamps between the kernel LTTng
and UST on x86. It should be ready very soon. Keep posted for a new
release. :)

By the way, in the initial implementation, only 64-bit processes on
64-bit x86 systems with synchronized TSCs will benefit from the vDSO
speed. All other x86 setups will fallback on a system call, which will
still work, albeit being a bit slower.

Thanks,

Mathieu

* Alexandre Montplaisir (alexandre.montplaisir at polymtl.ca) wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've received this bug report about kernel/UST trace synchronization.  
> Anyone knows what's the status on this?
>
> Thanks,
> Alexandre
>
>
> On 10-11-26 03:24 AM, Florent Boudet wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am sorry to contact you directly instead of filling a bug, but it
>> seems the option is disabled on the launchpad project...
>>
>> I have recorded userspace traces at the same time as kernel traces, and
>> opened both with LTTv.
>> Timestamp for userspace traces and timestamp for kernel traces have
>> different origins, which make it difficult to analyze.
>> I am not sure about the cause, this might be related to a GMT/localtime
>> issue...
>>
>> Regards,
>> Florent Boudet
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ltt-dev mailing list
> ltt-dev at lists.casi.polymtl.ca
> http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
>

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com



  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-26 13:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20101126082453.4252.72312.launchpad@wampee.canonical.com>
2010-11-26 13:08 ` Alexandre Montplaisir
2010-11-26 13:32   ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2010-11-26 13:47     ` David Goulet
2010-11-29 22:43       ` florent boudet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101126133256.GA22133@Krystal \
    --to=compudj@krystal.dyndns.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox