From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: compudj@krystal.dyndns.org (Mathieu Desnoyers)
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 07:30:18 -0500
Subject: [ltt-dev] [PATCH 2/2] introduce uatomic_and and uatomic_or
In-Reply-To: <4CDD32AC.2050308@redhat.com>
References: <1289552247-18130-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
	<1289552247-18130-3-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
	<20101112120846.GB27929@Krystal> <4CDD2F69.7020407@redhat.com>
	<20101112121900.GA29642@Krystal> <4CDD31E7.1050500@redhat.com>
	<4CDD32AC.2050308@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20101112123018.GB30826@Krystal>

* Paolo Bonzini (pbonzini at redhat.com) wrote:
> On 11/12/2010 01:24 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Should I rename uatomic_add to uatomic_xchg_add too (I prefer this name
>> to uatomic_return_add)?
>
> Uh, uatomic_add returns void actually.  Then returning void from  
> uatomic_{and,or} is indeed more consistent.

Ah! I knew we'd find the culprit!! ;-)

Thanks,

Mathieu


-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com