Mirror of the lttng-dev mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Francis.Giraldeau@USherbrooke.ca (Francis Giraldeau)
Subject: [ltt-dev] Experiments on CPU time statistics
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:50:29 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101111125029.18064gu6bt6eo084@www.usherbrooke.ca> (raw)

Hi,

I'm doing some experiments with CPU statistics, and I think that those  
computed by lttv are wrong. I did 3 tests, and for each command the  
time utility was used to get a baseline, and the command has been run  
between lttctl -C and lttctl -D to get a tight window around the test  
process.

=================================================
trace-bonnie.sh : start bonnie++ process for 10s

time statistics:
real	0m10.715s

user	0m0.420s

sys	0m6.350s


lttv statistics:

events count        : 11088588

cpu time            : 80.051904112

elapsed time?       : 544.593369365

cumulative cpu time : 6.747053976

=================================================
sleep 1s : start a sleep of 1s

time statistics:
real	0m1.002s

user	0m0.000s

sys	0m0.000s


lttv statistics:
events count        : 94929


cpu time            : 7.841686487

elapsed time        : 34.566952675

cumulative cpu time : 0.036465023


=================================================
trace-burn.sh 1s * 8 process simultan?s

time statistics:
real	0m1.031s

user	0m7.650s

sys	0m0.020s


lttv statistics:
events count        : 95402

cpu time            : 8.584145675

elapsed time        : 33.845893813

cumulative cpu time : 0.037255816
=================================================

I was expecting lttv enlapsed time to be close to real time, lttv  
cumulative cpu time to be greater or equal to lttv cpu time, and lttc  
cpu time to match user + sys time. Does it make sens, or maybe I'm  
getting something wrong?

Cheer,

Francis





             reply	other threads:[~2010-11-11 17:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-11 17:50 Francis Giraldeau [this message]
2010-11-11 18:59 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-11-11 19:23   ` Michel Dagenais
2010-11-11 21:05   ` Francis Giraldeau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101111125029.18064gu6bt6eo084@www.usherbrooke.ca \
    --to=francis.giraldeau@usherbrooke.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox