From: compudj@krystal.dyndns.org (Mathieu Desnoyers)
Subject: [ltt-dev] 2.6.12-rc4-mm2-lttng-0.4.3 vs LTT in MVista 2.6.10
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 11:56:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100619155629.GD22882@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim3xiD_eobIN67PC-nV9gzm3udtIkpOkJLt_lBr@mail.gmail.com>
* Brian Hutchinson (b.hutchman at gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First post. I'm trying to determine if the features in the LTTng
> version 0.4.3 would be any better than the version of LTT that came
> with our MVista 2.6.10 kernel.
>
> Obviously, my time would be better spent trying to get a newer kernel
> & LTTng going but we have an immediate need to debug a 2.6.10 based
> app.
I'd recommend trying to run the application under a newer kernel, hoping
to reproduce the problem. You might be lucky.
I don't see much value in trying to resurrect the first LTTng versions
ever published.
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
> Does anyone have experience going back this far that can comment?
>
> I used the older LTT around the time Karim came out with the 1st
> version of his Embedded Linux book but I'm not familiar with what
> LTTng brings to the table ... I know it is probably the tool of choice
> in modern kernels but I'm wondering if we would see any benefit of
> attempting to get it working with such an old kernel.
>
> Regards,
>
> Brian
>
> _______________________________________________
> ltt-dev mailing list
> ltt-dev at lists.casi.polymtl.ca
> http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
>
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-19 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <AANLkTim3xiD_eobIN67PC-nV9gzm3udtIkpOkJLt_lBr@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <AANLkTimSk3vuRyIitonLJG1y28--aaqwuUXuUB0Zslkd@mail.gmail.com>
2010-06-19 15:55 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-06-19 15:56 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100619155629.GD22882@Krystal \
--to=compudj@krystal.dyndns.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox