Mirror of the lttng-dev mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: compudj@krystal.dyndns.org (Mathieu Desnoyers)
Subject: [ltt-dev] [PATCH 12/12] centralize definition of BITS_PER_LONG
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:46:00 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100218134600.GA5825@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B7CFE10.8070803@redhat.com>

* Paolo Bonzini (pbonzini at redhat.com) wrote:
> On 02/18/2010 04:25 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>>> >  +#if defined(__SIZEOF_LONG__)
>>> >  +#define BITS_PER_LONG	(__SIZEOF_LONG__ * 8)
>>> >  +#elif defined(_LP64)
>> How about _LLP64 and _ILP64 ? (not sure exactly which architectures
>> would fit in this category nowadays though).
>
> They are not defined by GCC.

Good to know.

>
> I32LLP64 is basically only Mingw64 and ia64-hpux.

And anyway I32LLP64 have 4-byte longs, so they should work anyway with
these tests.

> They'd probably break  
> horribly because with 99% likelihood somewhere there is an assumption  
> that sizeof (long) == sizeof (void*).

In the atomic ops headers possibly, yes.

>
> What used ILP64, maybe some Cray?

Let's ask Paul to see what he knows about this.

As I pointed out, it's not a show stopper not to support everything, but
at least we should know what our limitations are.

Thanks,

Mathieu

>
> Paolo
>

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68




  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-18 13:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-15 19:04 [ltt-dev] [PATCH 00/12] provide default definition of uatomic builtins Paolo Bonzini
2010-02-15 19:04 ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 01/12] use kernel style makefile output Paolo Bonzini
2010-02-15 19:04 ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 02/12] use autoconf symbolic linking Paolo Bonzini
2010-02-15 19:04 ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 03/12] add urcu/arch_defaults.h Paolo Bonzini
2010-02-18  2:57   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-02-15 19:04 ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 04/12] define sync_core for x86 PIC Paolo Bonzini
2010-02-15 19:04 ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 05/12] remove compat_uatomic_cmpxchg #define from non-x86 Paolo Bonzini
2010-02-15 19:04 ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 06/12] add uatomic_defaults.h, use it for default definitions Paolo Bonzini
2010-02-18  3:10   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-02-15 19:04 ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 07/12] use uatomic_defaults.h for common fallback implementations Paolo Bonzini
2010-02-15 19:04 ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 08/12] move whether atomic byte/short exists to uatomic_arch_*.h Paolo Bonzini
2010-02-18  3:12   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-02-15 19:04 ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 09/12] add Alpha support Paolo Bonzini
2010-02-18  3:21   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-02-15 19:04 ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 10/12] support compiling on unknown architectures Paolo Bonzini
2010-02-18  3:22   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-02-15 19:04 ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 11/12] avoid multiple evaluation of STORE_SHARED argument Paolo Bonzini
2010-02-18  3:28   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-02-18  8:45     ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-02-15 19:04 ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 12/12] centralize definition of BITS_PER_LONG Paolo Bonzini
2010-02-18  3:25   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-02-18  8:45     ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-02-18 13:46       ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2010-02-18 15:27         ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-02-18 16:09           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-02-19 19:25             ` [ltt-dev] lock-free data structures (was Re: [PATCH 12/12] centralize definition of BITS_PER_LONG) Paolo Bonzini
2010-02-19 23:51               ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-02-20  0:10                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-02-20  0:44                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-02-15 19:04 ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 13/12] test uatomic_defaults.h Paolo Bonzini
2010-02-19 19:22 [ltt-dev] [PATCH 00/12] provide generic version of uatomic and other per-arch defs Paolo Bonzini
2010-02-19 19:22 ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 12/12] centralize definition of BITS_PER_LONG Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100218134600.GA5825@Krystal \
    --to=compudj@krystal.dyndns.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox