From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: gregory.haskins@gmail.com (Gregory Haskins) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:24:23 -0400 Subject: [ltt-dev] patches for 31-rc5? In-Reply-To: <20090813142324.GA32765@Krystal> References: <4A82DDAA.1060801@gmail.com> <20090813135241.GB31960@Krystal> <20090813142324.GA32765@Krystal> Message-ID: <4A84CAD7.3030306@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20090814022423.85UR6XhD8Fg5VhmRpgdmVOwtEGC-K5gHCW1wKSfls5k@z> Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > * Mathieu Desnoyers (compudj at krystal.dyndns.org) wrote: >> * Gregory Haskins (gregory.haskins at gmail.com) wrote: >>> Are there any in the works? If not, perhaps I can take a stab at the >>> forward port. >>> >> Not yet, but -rc5 sounds like a good timing to start forward porting. >> I'll look into this today. >> > > Hrm, the instrumentation part will take a while to port, because we have > more and more clashes with ftrace. > > If you want to start working on this, please provide patches in the > form: > > original-patch.reject-fix-2.6.31.patch > > for each patch which has rejects, so I can look at the result and merge > them through the patchset. > > Note that the cpufreq stuff and the alternative cleanup at the beginning > of the patchset are already merged in mainline. > > I will not have the necessary time to do the port for a while, it will > probably have to wait closer to 2.6.31 on my side. But patches are > welcome. Ok, Thanks for the reply Mathieu. If I get a chance (largely driven by how bad I need the tracer in 31 at any given moment ;) I will take a crack at it. Regards, -Greg -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 267 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: