From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mingo@elte.hu (Ingo Molnar) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:42:55 +0200 Subject: [ltt-dev] [PATCH] Fix dirty page accounting in redirty_page_for_writepage() In-Reply-To: References: <20090430024303.GB19875@Krystal> <20090430133859.GB8329@elte.hu> <20090430141446.GD14696@elte.hu> <20090430143819.GF14696@elte.hu> <20090430150142.GC20580@elte.hu> Message-ID: <20090430154255.GA3714@elte.hu> * Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > Could you cite a specific example / situation where you'd use __xxx > > ops? > > Well the cpu alloc v3 patchset (already cited) included numerous > locations. Sure wish we could move much of the core stats over to > percpu ops. Here is a list of some stats patches that do not need > irq disable. > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cross-arch/1128 > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cross-arch/1132 > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cross-arch/1134 > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cross-arch/1138 > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cross-arch/1139 > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cross-arch/1145 VM stats > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cross-arch/1160 NFS stats > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cross-arch/1161 Genhd stats > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cross-arch/1163 Socket inuse counter > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cross-arch/1164 SRCU nice. Do these all get called with irqs off, all the time? Ingo