From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mingo@elte.hu (Ingo Molnar)
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:59:48 +0200
Subject: [ltt-dev] [PATCH] Fix dirty page accounting
	in	redirty_page_for_writepage()
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0904301034370.4028@qirst.com>
References: <20090429232546.GB15782@Krystal>
	<alpine.LFD.2.00.0904291701450.22156@localhost.localdomain>
	<20090430024303.GB19875@Krystal>
	<alpine.DEB.1.10.0904300921290.22262@qirst.com>
	<20090430133859.GB8329@elte.hu> <20090430135005.GA5922@Krystal>
	<20090430143215.GE14696@elte.hu>
	<alpine.DEB.1.10.0904301034370.4028@qirst.com>
Message-ID: <20090430145948.GB20580@elte.hu>


* Christoph Lameter <cl at linux.com> wrote:

> I am fine with how things developed. The core patches fell off the 
> priority list after job change. Just get the things that are not 
> right now straightened out.

Regarding the __xxx ops i'm on two minds really. If there's a 
significant architecture that really cannot live without them (if
it does not have the proper machine instructions _and_ local irq 
disabling is unreasonably expensive) then i guess we could (and 
should) add them.

Otherwise we should just try to be as simple as possible.

	Ingo