Mirror of the lttng-dev mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com (KOSAKI Motohiro)
Subject: [ltt-dev] LTTng 0.87 improved page fault tracing
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:47:05 +0900 (JST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090129134614.A95F.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090129044356.GA26018@Krystal>

> * KOSAKI Motohiro (kosaki.motohiro at jp.fujitsu.com) wrote:
> > Hi
> > 
> > interesting..
> > 
> > > I just combined the 4 page fault handler events that were in the tracing
> > > hot path of LTTng into 2 :
> > > 
> > > kernel page_fault_entry
> > > kernel page_fault_exit
> > > 
> > > They take as parameter the combination of what was available in the
> > > trap_entry/exit events and handle_mm_fault entry/exit events. This
> > > should lessen the performance impact of the tracer when it's active.
> > > I did the related modifications in LTTV 0.12.8.
> > 
> > Just question.
> > 
> > As far as I know, customer has two different requeremtn of the page fault.
> 
>     1 a)
> >   (1) collect number of all page fault
> >       -> if it is too large, too many interrupt decrease performance.
>         (a single event is required for this)
> 
>     1 b) the user may also want to know the time spent in the page fault
>     handler to service those faults, therefore involving page fault
>     entry and exit events.

Indeed.
that's great.


> >   (2) collect number of major page fault
> >       -> major page fault indicate to increase random access I/O,
> >          then, some customer want to collect major page fault
> >          (don't include minor page fault)
> 
> Yes, the trace_page_fault_exit takes the "fault" parameter returned by
> handle_mm_fault (which is recorded to the trace as the "res" event
> field). Using
> 
> res & VM_FAULT_MAJOR
> 
> will give only the major page faults. Note that some knowledge of the
> bitmask is required to interpret the "res" bitfield. This could be done
> by a specific analysis module. I would ideally like to create a LTTng
> module to export tables including those bitfields so we can keep the
> bitfield interpretation in sync with the kernel code changes more or
> less automatically.

Agreed.
thanks for great improvement.


> 
> > 
> > Is this patch fill (2) requirement?
> > 
> 
> Yes.
> 
> Mathieu
> 
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Mathieu Desnoyers
> OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68







      reply	other threads:[~2009-01-29  4:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-27 21:02 Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-29  3:42 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-01-29  4:43   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-29  4:47     ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090129134614.A95F.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox