From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: compudj@krystal.dyndns.org (Mathieu Desnoyers) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:53:40 -0500 Subject: [ltt-dev] Interpreting tracing results In-Reply-To: <1E65288790442545B413D69F2A8D27DE045EBC7B@ERLD164A.ww004.siemens.net> References: <1E65288790442545B413D69F2A8D27DE045EBBC4@ERLD164A.ww004.siemens.net> <20090115151855.GA27345@Krystal> <1E65288790442545B413D69F2A8D27DE045EBC7B@ERLD164A.ww004.siemens.net> Message-ID: <20090115175339.GA31571@Krystal> * Akyurek, Ali (EXT) (ali.akyurek.ext at siemens.com) wrote: > > Hi > > So, it means that calculating a context switching time in arm is not sensible for now,huh? > Because i found that 1220 ns. > > And 1220 ns is just = [1 / (HZ << TRACE_CLOCK_SHIFT)]. > > // HZ is 100 in my system, and trace_clock_shift is 13 > Exactly. You cannot expect that kind of precision on ARM currently without implementing a more precise trace-clock suited for your sub-architecture, possibly based on a free timer. Mathieu > Thanks. > > > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Mathieu Desnoyers [mailto:compudj at krystal.dyndns.org] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Januar 2009 16:19 > An: Akyurek, Ali (EXT) > Cc: ltt-dev at lists.casi.polymtl.ca > Betreff: Re: [ltt-dev] Interpreting tracing results > > * Akyurek, Ali (EXT) (ali.akyurek.ext at siemens.com) wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > In my arm machine, context switching takes 1220 or 1221 nanoseconds. > > i thought this time as (start of sched_schedule - start of > > whatever_previous_event), Actually that is the time between different > > PID values in rows.am i right? > > > > and > > > > Handling of interrupts (i take only the top handlers, not soft ones.) > > takes 2441 nanoseconds. > > i thought this time as (end of irq_exit - start of irq_entry), am i > > right? > > > > Why are these values multiple of 1220 nanoseconds? What is related to? > > > > Hi, > > LTTng uses the generic trace clock for ARM by default. See > include/asm-generic/trace-clock.h. > > This clock has only the precision of HZ frequency, and I use an atomic > counter in the LSBs to keep the events ordered. > > Please have a look at the ARM-related messages in the past 2 weeks for > implementations of sub-arch specific clock sources for ARM. I will > integrate this kind of work soon after making sure it's smp-safe when it > needs to. > > Mathieu > > > Thanks all. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ltt-dev mailing list > > ltt-dev at lists.casi.polymtl.ca > > http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev > > > > -- > Mathieu Desnoyers > OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68 > -- Mathieu Desnoyers OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68