From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: compudj@krystal.dyndns.org (Mathieu Desnoyers)
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:45:21 -0500
Subject: [ltt-dev] LTTng 0.74 for Linux 2.6.28 (ext4 tracepoints)	(fixed
	in LTTng 0.78)
In-Reply-To: <20090114001346.GB14730@mit.edu>
References: <20090109235449.GA21999@Krystal> <20090110161137.GA20526@Krystal>
	<2f11576a0901131433h31056e34n82588a9c643224de@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090113225827.GA5791@Krystal> <20090114001346.GB14730@mit.edu>
Message-ID: <20090115014521.GG7458@Krystal>

* Theodore Tso (tytso at mit.edu) wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 05:58:27PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > > 
> > > -ECANTBUILD
> > > 
> > Thanks for the report. This should be fixed in LTTng 0.78 now.
> 
> Out of curiosity, do you maintain a branch of LTTNG versus any of the
> -rc kernels, or do you only track the stable kernels?  I tried pulling
> LTTNG 0.78 against the most recent Linus mainline and got a whole pile
> of conflicts.
> 
> I then tried building LTTng 0.78 and got build failures:
> 
>   CC      arch/x86/kernel/init_task.o
> distcc[27501] ERROR: compile /var/cache/ccache/init_task.tmp.closure.27497.i on localhost failed
> /usr/projects/linux/ext4/arch/x86/kernel/init_task.c:35: error: unknown field ?user_markers_mutex? specified in initializer
> /usr/projects/linux/ext4/arch/x86/kernel/init_task.c:35: warning: braces around scalar initializer
> /usr/projects/linux/ext4/arch/x86/kernel/init_task.c:35: warning: (near initialization for ?init_task.latency_record_count?)
> /usr/projects/linux/ext4/arch/x86/kernel/init_task.c:35: error: field name not in record or union initializer
> /usr/projects/linux/ext4/arch/x86/kernel/init_task.c:35: error: (near initialization for ?init_task.latency_record_count?)
> 
> Looks like CONFIG_MARKERS_USERSPAC is busted....
> 

Hi Ted,

I'm currently integrating Lai's work to the 2.6.28 lttng branch (ascii
output !) :) and the next step will be to move to 2.6.29-rc1. I'll keep
you posted. Note that you can just leave the 

#New revamped userspace markers

markers-userspace.patch
markers-userspace-x86.patch
markers-userspace-x86_64.patch
sparc64-support-userspace-tracing.patch

Out of the patchset and it should not hurt the kernel tracing part at
all.?Note that these 4 patches are planned to be heavily reworked before
lkml submission.

Mathieu

> 						- Ted
> 

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68