From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: compudj@krystal.dyndns.org (Mathieu Desnoyers)
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:45:03 -0500
Subject: [ltt-dev] move marker-control file into debugfs
In-Reply-To: <496A9AE3.5050004@cn.fujitsu.com>
References: <496A9AE3.5050004@cn.fujitsu.com>
Message-ID: <20090112014503.GB23423@Krystal>

* Gui Jianfeng (guijianfeng at cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
> 
> I'd like to move "/proc/ltt" into debugfs. How do
> you think of that? If you don't object, i'll post
> a patch later, and update ltt-arm and other relative
> tools.
> 

Yes, this should be done. Please have a look at the discussion I had
with Zhaolei on this. It was on the ltt-dev ML.

Basically, the idea is to change the semantics a bit. The following
directory tree would be great :

/mnt/debugfs/ltt/markers/
                         <channel_names>/
                                         <marker_names>/

And within each individual <marker_names>/ directory, we would have
those files :

enabled (write, takes Y, y, 1 or N, n, 0. See ltt-trace-control.c.)
        (read, prints 1 or 0)

We may want to remove the ability to connect markers to specific probes.
Markers would always be only connected to the default serializer.
Markers using ltt-type-serializer does not use the probe pointer anyway.

We will probably want to let the
kernel/marker.c:add_marker()/remove_marker() code call into the debugfs
interface code to update the directory tree accordingly.

Regards,

Mathieu


> -- 
> Regards
> Gui Jianfeng
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ltt-dev mailing list
> ltt-dev at lists.casi.polymtl.ca
> http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
> 

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68