From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com (KOSAKI Motohiro)
Date: Tue,  2 Dec 2008 13:44:51 +0900 (JST)
Subject: [ltt-dev] [PATCH] Poll : introduce poll_wait_exclusive() new
	function
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0812011711280.27086@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com>
References: <20081128131311.GC10401@Krystal>
	<alpine.DEB.1.10.0812011711280.27086@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com>
Message-ID: <20081202134241.1CF4.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>

> > Any thought ?
> 
> That looks fine, but before waving the Thundering Herd flag some 
> performance numbers should be given IMO, considerng also that this is a 
> rather particular use of the poll subsystem.
> Eventually, isn't something like the patch below better than adding custom 
> case names to poll_wait() ALA poll_wait_LONGNAMESFOLLOW()?
> That way you can pass your own queueing function:
> 
> 	poll_wait_qfunc(file, head, pt, add_wait_queue_exclusive);

make sense.
I don't found any bug in your patch.

	Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro at jp.fujitsu.com>


Thanks.