Mirror of the lttng-dev mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ondřej Surý via lttng-dev" <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org, paulmck <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [lttng-dev] [PATCH 7/7] Experiment: Add explicit memory barrier in free_completion()
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 15:48:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1B64F3D0-EB5C-4023-BA15-37D0DBCBB1B3@sury.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <66635c75-b869-9704-edac-21026cce2b99@efficios.com>

> On 21. 3. 2023, at 15:46, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> wrote:
> 
> On 2023-03-21 06:21, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>>> On 20. 3. 2023, at 19:37, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 2023-03-17 17:37, Ondřej Surý via lttng-dev wrote:
>>>> FIXME: This is experiment that adds explicit memory barrier in the
>>>> free_completion in the workqueue.c, so ThreadSanitizer knows it's ok to
>>>> free the resources.
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ondřej Surý <ondrej@sury.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>  src/workqueue.c | 1 +
>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>> diff --git a/src/workqueue.c b/src/workqueue.c
>>>> index 1039d72..f21907f 100644
>>>> --- a/src/workqueue.c
>>>> +++ b/src/workqueue.c
>>>> @@ -377,6 +377,7 @@ void free_completion(struct urcu_ref *ref)
>>>>   struct urcu_workqueue_completion *completion;
>>>>     completion = caa_container_of(ref, struct urcu_workqueue_completion, ref);
>>>> + assert(!urcu_ref_get_unless_zero(&completion->ref));
>>> 
>>> Perhaps what we really want here is an ANNOTATE_UNPUBLISH_MEMORY_RANGE() of some sort ?
>> I guess?
>> My experience with TSAN tells me, that you need some kind of memory barrier when using acquire-release
>> semantics and you do:
>> if (__atomic_sub_fetch(obj->ref, __ATOMIC_RELEASE) == 0) {
>>   /* __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE needed here */
>>    free(obj);
>> }
>> we end up using following code in BIND 9:
>> if (__atomic_sub_fetch(obj->ref, __ATOMIC_ACQ_REL) == 0) {
>>    free(obj);
>> }
>> So, I am guessing after the change of uatomic_sub_return() to __ATOMIC_ACQ_REL,
>> this patch should no longer be needed.
> 
> Actually we want __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST, which is even stronger than ACQ_REL.

Yeah, I think I already did that, but wrote the email before that. Nevertheless, my main
point was that it should not be needed anymore.

Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý (He/Him)
ondrej@sury.org

_______________________________________________
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-21 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-17 21:37 [lttng-dev] [PATCH 0/7] Replace the custom code with gcc/clang __atomic builtins Ondřej Surý via lttng-dev
2023-03-17 21:37 ` [lttng-dev] [PATCH 1/7] Require __atomic builtins to build Ondřej Surý via lttng-dev
2023-03-17 21:37 ` [lttng-dev] [PATCH 2/7] Use gcc __atomic builtis for <urcu/uatomic.h> implementation Ondřej Surý via lttng-dev
2023-03-20 18:03   ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2023-03-20 18:13     ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2023-03-20 18:28     ` Ondřej Surý via lttng-dev
2023-03-20 18:38       ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2023-03-20 18:41         ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2023-03-20 19:38     ` Duncan Sands via lttng-dev
2023-03-21 20:26       ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2023-03-22  8:24         ` Duncan Sands via lttng-dev
2023-03-17 21:37 ` [lttng-dev] [PATCH 3/7] Use __atomic_thread_fence() for cmm_barrier() Ondřej Surý via lttng-dev
2023-03-20 18:06   ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2023-03-20 18:14     ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2023-03-17 21:37 ` [lttng-dev] [PATCH 4/7] Replace the internal pointer manipulation with __atomic builtins Ondřej Surý via lttng-dev
2023-03-20 18:25   ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2023-03-17 21:37 ` [lttng-dev] [PATCH 5/7] Use __atomic builtins to implement CMM_{LOAD, STORE}_SHARED Ondřej Surý via lttng-dev
2023-03-20 18:28   ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2023-03-17 21:37 ` [lttng-dev] [PATCH 6/7] Fix: uatomic_or() need retyping to uintptr_t in rculfhash.c Ondřej Surý via lttng-dev
2023-03-20 18:31   ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2023-03-21 10:15     ` Ondřej Surý via lttng-dev
2023-03-21 14:44       ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2023-03-21 14:45         ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2023-03-17 21:37 ` [lttng-dev] [PATCH 7/7] Experiment: Add explicit memory barrier in free_completion() Ondřej Surý via lttng-dev
2023-03-20 18:37   ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2023-03-21 10:21     ` Ondřej Surý via lttng-dev
2023-03-21 14:46       ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2023-03-21 14:48         ` Ondřej Surý via lttng-dev [this message]
2023-03-21 14:49           ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2023-03-21 14:59             ` [lttng-dev] TSAN and the tests Ondřej Surý via lttng-dev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1B64F3D0-EB5C-4023-BA15-37D0DBCBB1B3@sury.org \
    --to=lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=ondrej@sury.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox