From: mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com (Mathieu Desnoyers)
Subject: [lttng-dev] [PATCH lttng-modules v6 4/5] Extract the payload for epoll_ctl
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 14:17:12 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1938422112.74697.1462025832628.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461970404-27468-5-git-send-email-jdesfossez@efficios.com>
----- On Apr 29, 2016, at 6:53 PM, Julien Desfossez jdesfossez at efficios.com wrote:
> Map the operation to its name (EPOLL_CTL_*), extract the standard event
> flags (EPOLL*) and output the data in two different formats: FD as an
> int in decimal, and u64 in hex. The less standard event flags are not
> extracted yet, but we extract the raw value in hex for more advanced
> analyses.
>
> Here is an example output:
> syscall_entry_epoll_ctl: {
> epfd = 4, op_enum = ( "EPOLL_CTL_ADD" : container = 1 ),
> fd = 0, event = { raw_events = 0x80000003,
> events = { EPOLLIN = 1, EPOLLPRI = 1, EPOLLOUT = 0, EPOLLERR = 0,
> padding = 0 },
> data_union = { u64 = 0x0, fd = 0 } }
> }
>
> syscall_exit_epoll_ctl: { ret = 0 }
>
> Signed-off-by: Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez at efficios.com>
> ---
> .../syscalls/headers/syscalls_pointers_override.h | 140 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 140 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/instrumentation/syscalls/headers/syscalls_pointers_override.h
> b/instrumentation/syscalls/headers/syscalls_pointers_override.h
> index 11d5f3d..59931df 100644
> --- a/instrumentation/syscalls/headers/syscalls_pointers_override.h
> +++ b/instrumentation/syscalls/headers/syscalls_pointers_override.h
> @@ -555,4 +555,144 @@ SC_LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT_CODE(ppoll,
> )
> #endif /* defined(CONFIG_X86_32) || defined(CONFIG_X86_64) ||
> defined(CONFIG_ARM64) || defined(CONFIG_ARM) */
>
> +#include <linux/eventpoll.h>
> +
> +SC_LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_ENUM(lttng_epoll_op,
> + TP_ENUM_VALUES(
> + ctf_enum_value("EPOLL_CTL_ADD", EPOLL_CTL_ADD)
> + ctf_enum_value("EPOLL_CTL_DEL", EPOLL_CTL_DEL)
> + ctf_enum_value("EPOLL_CTL_MOD", EPOLL_CTL_MOD)
> + )
> +)
> +
> +#ifndef ONCE_LTTNG_TRACE_EPOLL_CTL_H
> +#define ONCE_LTTNG_TRACE_EPOLL_CTL_H
> +
> +#define LTTNG_EPOLL_NRFLAGS (POLLHUP + 1)
> +#define EPOLL_FLAGS_PADDING_SIZE (sizeof(uint8_t) * BITS_PER_BYTE) - \
> + ilog2(LTTNG_EPOLL_NRFLAGS - 1)
> +
> +/*
> + * Only extract the values specified by iBCS2 for now.
> + */
> +static struct lttng_event_field lttng_epoll_ctl_events_fields[] = {
> + /* 0x0001 */
> + [ilog2(POLLIN)] = {
> + .name = "EPOLLIN",
> + .type = __type_integer(int, 1, 1, 0, __LITTLE_ENDIAN, 10, none),
> + },
> + /* 0x0002 */
> + [ilog2(POLLPRI)] = {
> + .name = "EPOLLPRI",
> + .type = __type_integer(int, 1, 1, 0, __LITTLE_ENDIAN, 10, none),
> + },
> + /* 0x0004 */
> + [ilog2(POLLOUT)] = {
> + .name = "EPOLLOUT",
> + .type = __type_integer(int, 1, 1, 0, __LITTLE_ENDIAN, 10, none),
> + },
> + /* 0x0008 */
> + [ilog2(POLLERR)] = {
> + .name = "EPOLLERR",
> + .type = __type_integer(int, 1, 1, 0, __LITTLE_ENDIAN, 10, none),
> + },
> + /* 0x0010 */
> + [ilog2(POLLHUP)] = {
> + .name = "EPOLLHUP",
> + .type = __type_integer(int, 1, 1, 0, __LITTLE_ENDIAN, 10, none),
> + },
> + [ilog2(LTTNG_EPOLL_NRFLAGS)] = {
> + .name = "padding",
> + .type = __type_integer(int, EPOLL_FLAGS_PADDING_SIZE, 1, 0,
> + __LITTLE_ENDIAN, 10, none),
> + },
> +
> +};
> +
> +static struct lttng_event_field lttng_epoll_data_fields[] = {
> + [0] = {
> + .name = "u64",
> + .type = __type_integer(uint64_t, 0, 0, 0, __BYTE_ORDER, 16, none),
> + },
> + [1] = {
> + .name = "fd",
> + .type = __type_integer(int, 0, 0, 0, __BYTE_ORDER, 10, none),
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static struct lttng_event_field epoll_ctl_fields[] = {
> + [0] = {
> + .name = "data_union",
> + .type = {
> + .atype = atype_struct,
> + .u._struct.nr_fields = ARRAY_SIZE(lttng_epoll_data_fields),
> + .u._struct.fields = lttng_epoll_data_fields,
> + }
> + },
> + [1] = {
> + .name = "raw_events",
> + .type = __type_integer(uint32_t, 0, 0, 0, __BYTE_ORDER, 16, none),
> + },
> + [2] = {
> + .name = "events",
> + .type = {
> + .atype = atype_struct,
> + .u._struct.nr_fields = ARRAY_SIZE(lttng_epoll_ctl_events_fields),
> + .u._struct.fields = lttng_epoll_ctl_events_fields,
> + }
> + },
> +};
> +#endif /* ONCE_LTTNG_TRACE_EPOLL_CTL_H */
> +
> +#if defined(CONFIG_X86_32) || defined(CONFIG_X86_64) || defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
> || defined(CONFIG_ARM)
> +#define OVERRIDE_32_epoll_ctl
> +#define OVERRIDE_64_epoll_ctl
> +SC_LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT_CODE(epoll_ctl,
> + TP_PROTO(sc_exit(long ret,) int epfd, int op, int fd,
> + struct epoll_event __user * uevent),
> + TP_ARGS(sc_exit(ret,) epfd, op, fd, uevent),
> + TP_locvar(
> + struct epoll_event event;
> + int err;
> + ),
> + TP_code_pre(
> + tp_locvar->err = lib_ring_buffer_copy_from_user_check_nofault(
> + &tp_locvar->event, uevent, sizeof(struct epoll_event));
> + ),
> + TP_FIELDS(
> + sc_exit(ctf_integer(long, ret, ret))
> + sc_in(ctf_integer(int, epfd, epfd))
> + sc_in(ctf_enum(lttng_epoll_op, int, op_enum, op))
> + sc_in(ctf_integer(int, fd, fd))
> + sc_in(
> + ctf_custom_field(
> + ctf_custom_type(
> + .atype = atype_struct,
> + .u._struct.nr_fields = ARRAY_SIZE(epoll_ctl_fields),
> + .u._struct.fields = epoll_ctl_fields,
> + ),
> + event,
> + ctf_custom_code(
> + ctf_align(uint64_t)
> + if (!tp_locvar->err) {
> + ctf_integer_type(uint64_t, tp_locvar->event.data)
> + ctf_integer_type(int, tp_locvar->event.data)
> + ctf_integer_bitfield_type(uint32_t,
> + cpu_to_le32(tp_locvar->event.events))
not sure why we reverse the endianness here ? It does not
match the "__BYTE_ORDER" type description, and differs from
the way raw_events fields is handled in the poll/ppoll instrumentation.
Thanks,
Mathieu
> + ctf_integer_bitfield_type(uint8_t,
> + (uint8_t) tp_locvar->event.events)
> + } else {
> + ctf_integer_type(uint64_t, 0)
> + ctf_integer_type(int, 0)
> + ctf_integer_bitfield_type(uint32_t, 0)
> + ctf_integer_bitfield_type(uint8_t, 0)
> + }
> + )
> + )
> + )
> + ),
> + TP_code_post()
> +)
> +#endif /* defined(CONFIG_X86_32) || defined(CONFIG_X86_64) ||
> defined(CONFIG_ARM64) || defined(CONFIG_ARM) */
> +
> #endif /* CREATE_SYSCALL_TABLE */
> --
> 1.9.1
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-30 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-29 22:53 [lttng-dev] [PATCH lttng-modules v6 0/5] Extract payload from polling syscalls Julien Desfossez
2016-04-29 22:53 ` [lttng-dev] [PATCH lttng-modules v6 1/5] Add ctf_integer_bitfield_type Julien Desfossez
2016-04-29 22:53 ` [lttng-dev] [PATCH lttng-modules v6 2/5] Extract the FD sets in select and pselect6 Julien Desfossez
2016-04-29 22:53 ` [lttng-dev] [PATCH lttng-modules v6 3/5] Extract the FDs and flags from poll and ppoll Julien Desfossez
2016-04-30 14:14 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2016-04-29 22:53 ` [lttng-dev] [PATCH lttng-modules v6 4/5] Extract the payload for epoll_ctl Julien Desfossez
2016-04-30 14:17 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2016-04-30 14:19 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2016-04-30 14:54 ` Julien Desfossez
2016-04-29 22:53 ` [lttng-dev] [PATCH lttng-modules v6 5/5] Extract the payload of epoll_wait/epoll_pwait Julien Desfossez
2016-04-30 14:22 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1938422112.74697.1462025832628.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox