----- On May 31, 2016, at 4:47 PM, Jonathan Rajotte Julien Jonathan.rajotte-julien at efficios.com wrote: > Hi Sebastien, > > I'll simply move the conversation here (from IRC) to have an archive of it. > > On 2016-05-31 09:39 AM, Sebastien Boisvert wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am in the process of writing a blog article on the use of the LTTng-UST >> userspace event tracer on Windows. >> >> I am building urcu and LTTng-UST in a Cygwin 64 environment. Then, I plan to use >> LTTng in Visual Studio Community, so I mostly need headers (.h) and shared >> libraries (.dll). > > Nice! > >> >> When I am building urcu (0.9.2), I get this message: >> >> libtool: link: warning: undefined symbols not allowed in x86_64-unknown-cygwin >> shared libraries > > This seems related to a Windows restriction regarding inter-library > dependencies [1], the relevant part: > > "Some platforms, such as Windows, do not even allow you this > flexibility. In order to build a shared library, it must be entirely > self-contained or it must have dependencies known at link time (that is, > have references only to symbols that are found in the .lo files or the > specified ā€˜-l’ libraries), and you need to specify the -no-undefined > flag. By default, libtool builds only static libraries on these kinds of > platforms." > > Looks like the -no-undefined might be a good start judging from this > patch I found for the urcu cygwin port in yacp [2]. > > Cheers! > > [1] > https://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual/libtool.html#Inter_002dlibrary-dependencies > [2] > https://github.com/fd00/yacp/blob/master/userspace-rcu/userspace-rcu-0.8.7-1bl1.src.patch Is there a way we could adapt this patch to urcu upstream without changing the behavior on non-cygwin builds ? Thanks, Mathieu >> >> The immediate consequence seems to be the absence of .dll files in the urcu >> build that I am generating. Otherwise, the build contains static library files >> and headers. >> >> However, I suppose that the .a static library files also have undefined symbols >> as I am getting linking issues when building LTTng-UST. >> >> Do you have a clue of what may be the issue here ? Otherwise, I will continue my >> investigation and get around the issue eventually. >> _______________________________________________ >> lttng-dev mailing list >> lttng-dev at lists.lttng.org >> https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev > > -- > Jonathan R. Julien > Efficios > > _______________________________________________ > lttng-dev mailing list > lttng-dev at lists.lttng.org > https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com