From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: dexuan.cui@intel.com (Cui, Dexuan)
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 12:05:28 +0800
Subject: [ltt-dev] lttng-ust: Inconsistent license info in manual and
	source code?
In-Reply-To: <4C64C25D.6000601@polymtl.ca>
References: <1865303E0DED764181A9D882DEF65FB6521EDABC07@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com>
	<4C64C25D.6000601@polymtl.ca>
Message-ID: <1865303E0DED764181A9D882DEF65FB6521EDABC08@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com>

Pierre-Marc Fournier wrote:
> On 08/12/2010 11:51 PM, Cui, Dexuan wrote:
>> Hi, in the latest release 0.5 of lttng-ust
>> (http://lttng.org/files/ust/releases/ust-0.5.tar.gz), I found in the
>> source directory, doc/manual/ust.html says ustctl/libustcmd/ustd are
>> licensed as GPL v2, but the source codes of ustctl/libustcmd/ustd
>> have a LGPLv2.1+ header.  I checked
>> git://git.dorsal.polymtl.ca/git/ust.git and it has the same issue.  
>> 
>> Could somebody please clarify the inconsistency? Thanks!
> 
> The licenses in the file have priority. The manual needs to be
> updated. 
> 
> pmf

Thanks a lot for the quick clarification! :-)

Thanks,
-- Dexuan