From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com (Mathieu Desnoyers)
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 19:02:08 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [lttng-dev] LTTng packages in Debian sid out of sync
In-Reply-To: <20131122185715.GA27557@shaniqua>
References: <630558869.45441.1382211345502.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
	<856849325.45462.1382211994767.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
	<20131019211009.GA83292@helmut.local>
	<300817690.45707.1382242504740.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
	<20131020134521.GA97360@helmut.local>
	<1084047903.45979.1382281219903.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
	<20131020160434.GA2011@helmut.local>
	<20131122185715.GA27557@shaniqua>
Message-ID: <1846575582.73471.1385146928205.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jon Bernard" <jbernard@debian.org>
> To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com>, "St?phane Graber" <stgraber at ubuntu.com>, "Alexandre
> Montplaisir" <alexmonthy at voxpopuli.im>, lttng-dev at lists.lttng.org
> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 1:57:15 PM
> Subject: Re: [lttng-dev] LTTng packages in Debian sid out of sync
> 
> * Jon Bernard <jbernard at debian.org> wrote:
> > * Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com> wrote:
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Jon Bernard" <jbernard@debian.org>
> > > > To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com>
> > > > Cc: "St?phane Graber" <stgraber at ubuntu.com>, "Alexandre Montplaisir"
> > > > <alexmonthy at voxpopuli.im>,
> > > > lttng-dev at lists.lttng.org
> > > > Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2013 9:45:21 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: LTTng packages in Debian sid out of sync
> > > > 
> > > [...]
> > > > 
> > > > That is not exactly what I intended to convey, let me be more direct
> > > > about my
> > > > view.  I completely agree that sid should have 2.3.x immediately.  I
> > > > also
> > > > agree
> > > > that 2.3 should be targeted for testing, and therefore the next stable
> > > > release.
> > > 
> > > Allright :) I'm glad we're on the same page, sorry for the
> > > misunderstanding.
> > 
> > No worries.  I'll add that future releases (like the upcoming 2.4) will
> > be prepared and tested all together prior to upload - to hopefully avoid
> > the previous situation/nightmare that I managed to get myself into.
> > 
> > There can still be a sizable amount of work for 2.3 to fully land into
> > testing, so that is my primary focus.  The freeze deadline is fast
> > approaching, so I will be keeping a close eye on things as they
> > progress.  As things settle I'll post status here.
> 
> I think I've got the UST upgrade packages in good shape and I uploaded
> a new lttng-tools to fix the armel build earlier today.  So, hopefully
> by just waiting a bit things should be in good shape and migrate into
> testing in early December (~10 days from now).  At the moment, 2.3.0 is
> complete in unstable (sid).

Great! Thanks for the updates! :)

Mathieu

> 
> --
> Jon
> 

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com