From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com (Mathieu Desnoyers)
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 19:44:40 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [lttng-dev] DEBUG_RCU vs RCU_DEBUG
In-Reply-To: <5534B3CA.6030306@free.fr>
References: <5534B3CA.6030306@free.fr>
Message-ID: <1338447584.35237.1429818280158.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>

----- Original Message -----
> I noticed that urcu-qsbr.h checks for RCU_DEBUG being defined while the rest
> of
> userspace-rcu (0.8.6) checks DEBUG_RCU.  Is this a mistake or a cunning plan?

Good catch! Even urcu/static/urcu-qsbr.h has a ifdef based on
DEBUG_RCU.

Will rename the urcu-qsbr.[ch] RCU_DEBUG to DEBUG_RCU, and I will
define RCU_DEBUG if DEBUG_RCU is defined in qsbr (for backward compat).
Fixes pushed into master, stable-0.8 and stable-0.7.

Thanks!

Mathieu

> 
> Ciao, Duncan.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lttng-dev mailing list
> lttng-dev at lists.lttng.org
> http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
> 

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com