From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pierre-marc.fournier@polymtl.ca (Pierre-Marc Fournier) Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:11:24 -0400 Subject: [ltt-dev] LTTng-UST -> UST In-Reply-To: References: <913BC6918ED247478A38326BC12AAECE034DAFA0@ESESSCMS0358.eemea.ericsson.se> <1283347446.8331.2.camel@Nokia-N900-42-11> Message-ID: <1283361084.8331.8.camel@Nokia-N900-42-11> ----- Original message ----- > Maybe the problem is in my head... :-) I'm actually just talking about > the? title on the webpage, code and manuals already just say UST mostly. > > My problem is that managers are going to the UST website and noting > LTTng-UST. Then they shorten it to LTTng (as they don't know better) > which? confuses everyone who knows about LTTng (the patches on the > kernel). Then,? once it's been explained to them about the kernel, and > userspace, and how? they're different and separate and so on they start > coming up with new? things. Yesterday I managed to stop one of them > writing down LTTng-KST? (kernelspace tracer). :-/ > > So, sorry for all the commotion. > > But maybe in the long-term we don't want to be called LTTng-UST? It's a > bit of a mouthfull and UST is short and sweet and doesn't share even > part? of the name with another project. It's also better from a > marketing? perspective. Just changing the title on the webpage and > changing the? README would pretty much do it. > I have no problem with these changes. pmf > /Nils > > On Wed, 1 Sep 2010, Pierre-Marc Fournier wrote: > > > Hi Nils, > > > > I'm not sure I understand the problem you are referring to. > > > > You are always free to say just UST, the tarballs are called > > ust.tar.gz, the Debian package name is ust. > > > > In what context do you see the project called LTTng-UST? Do you feel > > that it comes from the website? Are you proposing a separate website > > be made for ust? > > > > pmf > > > > ----- Original message ----- > > > When discussing LTTng-UST I very often run into some confusion about > > > the name, specifically people assume I'm talking about LTTng. In > > > order to reduce the amount of confusion I suggest we rename > > > LTTng-UST to just UST. > > > > > > Pierre-Marc, Mathieu, everyone else, any comments? > > > /Nils > > > > > > >