Mirror of the lttng-dev mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: douglas.santos@polymtl.ca (Douglas Santos)
Subject: [ltt-dev] UST - Problems in recording trace on a current process
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:25:51 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1265750750.4b71d2df012a0@www.imp.polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19fa8ef31002091240s57b513e0v81f524795b0f77ac@mail.gmail.com>

Quoting Naren <tracemein at gmail.com>:
> The program i want to trace is firefox with pid 1684.
>
> Here are the results of ldd'ing firefox
>
> *root at naren-laptop:/tmp# ldd /usr/lib/firefox-3.5.7/firefox-3.5*
> * **linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0xb7f27000)*
> * **libpthread.so.0 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0 (0xb7efc000)*
> * **libasound.so.2 => /usr/lib/libasound.so.2 (0xb7e35000)*
> * **libdl.so.2 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libdl.so.2 (0xb7e30000)*
> * **libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0xb7d3e000)*
> * **libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libm.so.6 (0xb7d18000)*
> * **libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0xb7cfa000)*
> * **libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (0xb7bb5000)*
> * **/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7f28000)*
> * **librt.so.1 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/librt.so.1 (0xb7bab000)*

You need to instrument the code and link it with libust.
Which seems isn't the case here.
http://lttng.org/files/ust/manual/ust.html#Instrumenting-an-application

here's an ldd example of a instrumented and linked prog.
$ ldd ../test/mk
	linux-vdso.so.1 =>  (0x00007fff919ff000)
	libust.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libust.so.0 (0x00007fe81031d000)
	libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x00007fe80ffae000)
	/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fe810542000)
	liburcu-bp.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/liburcu-bp.so.0 (0x00007fe80fdab000)
	libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007fe80fb8f000)


> In the manual http://lttng.org/files/ust/manual/ust.html, under section "5.2
> Setting up the recording manually", the command  given to enable markers "$
> ustctl --enable-marker 1234 ust/mymark" . However, after some reverse
> engineering, i found out that "parse_opts_long" function "ustctl.c" file
> expects pid to be the last argument and it is giving
> "*ustctl[1813/1813]: Error: The pid "ust/1" is invalid. (in
> parse_opts_long() at ustctl.c:159)*" error. Hence it would be "$ ustctl
> --enable-marker ust/mymark 1234". I am not sure of this though. Can you
> clarify?

The correct order is ustctl COMMAND PID





  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-02-09 21:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-08 21:49 Naren
2010-02-08 21:49 ` Naren
2010-02-08 22:19 ` Pierre-Marc Fournier
     [not found]   ` <19fa8ef31002081428x1e215acfgd81d505ee359ce9@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]     ` <201002081744.06912.pierre-marc.fournier@polymtl.ca>
2010-02-08 23:54       ` Naren
2010-02-08 23:54         ` Naren
2010-02-09  1:37         ` soumyakanti chakraborty
2010-02-09  1:37           ` soumyakanti chakraborty
2010-02-09  1:48           ` soumyakanti chakraborty
2010-02-09  1:48             ` soumyakanti chakraborty
2010-02-09  5:45             ` Pierre-Marc Fournier
2010-02-09 14:44               ` Naren
2010-02-09 14:44                 ` Naren
2010-02-09 14:51                 ` Douglas Santos
2010-02-09 14:51                 ` Douglas Santos
2010-02-09 16:43                   ` Naren
2010-02-09 16:43                     ` Naren
2010-02-09 17:11                     ` Pierre-Marc Fournier
2010-02-09 16:42             ` Pierre-Marc Fournier
2010-02-09 17:11               ` Naren
2010-02-09 17:11                 ` Naren
2010-02-09 17:25                 ` Pierre-Marc Fournier
2010-02-09 20:40                   ` Naren
2010-02-09 20:40                     ` Naren
2010-02-09 21:25                     ` Douglas Santos [this message]
2010-02-09 21:28                     ` Pierre-Marc Fournier
2010-02-10  0:50                       ` Naren
2010-02-10  0:50                         ` Naren
2010-02-10 15:26                         ` Pierre-Marc Fournier
2010-02-10 16:53                           ` Naren
2010-02-10 16:53                             ` Naren
2010-02-10 20:15                             ` Pierre-Marc Fournier
2010-02-10 22:08                               ` Naren
2010-02-10 22:08                                 ` Naren
2010-02-12  0:18                                 ` Pierre-Marc Fournier
2010-02-12  9:10                                   ` Naren
2010-02-12  9:10                                     ` Naren
2010-02-15  6:04                                 ` Pierre-Marc Fournier
2010-02-15  6:23                                   ` Naveh, Ido
2010-02-15 12:16                                     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-02-15 11:42                                   ` Naren
2010-02-15 11:42                                     ` Naren
2010-02-15 14:53                                     ` Pierre-Marc Fournier
2010-02-18 17:47                                 ` Pierre-Marc Fournier
2010-02-18 22:58                                   ` Naren
2010-02-18 22:58                                     ` Naren
2010-02-18 22:58                                     ` Naren
2010-02-19 16:50                                     ` Pierre-Marc Fournier
2010-02-19 17:15                                       ` Naren
2010-02-19 17:15                                         ` Naren
2010-02-19 17:15                                         ` Naren
2010-02-22  0:46                                         ` soumyakanti chakraborty
2010-02-22  0:46                                           ` soumyakanti chakraborty
2010-02-22  0:46                                           ` soumyakanti chakraborty
2010-02-23 15:15                                           ` Pierre-Marc Fournier
2010-02-26  1:55                                             ` soumyakanti chakraborty
2010-02-26  1:55                                               ` soumyakanti chakraborty
2010-02-26  1:55                                               ` soumyakanti chakraborty
2010-02-26  5:35                                               ` Pierre-Marc Fournier
2010-02-09 14:46 ` Douglas Santos

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1265750750.4b71d2df012a0@www.imp.polymtl.ca \
    --to=douglas.santos@polymtl.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox