Mirror of the lttng-dev mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bgamari@gmail.com (Ben Gamari)
Subject: [ltt-dev] [RFC PATCH] block: Fix bio merge induced high I/O latency
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 01:17:45 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1232518666.3695.68.camel@mercury.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090121045447.GA18334@Krystal>

On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 23:54 -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Ben Gamari (bgamari at gmail.com) wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers
> > <mathieu.desnoyers at polymtl.ca> wrote:
> > > * Mathieu Desnoyers (mathieu.desnoyers at polymtl.ca) wrote:
> > >
> > > As a side-note : I'd like to have my results confirmed by others.
> > 
> > Well, I think the (fixed) patch did help to some degree (I haven't
> > done fio benchmarks to compare against yet). Unfortunately, the I/O
> > wait time problem still remains. I have been waiting 3 minutes now for
> > evolution to start with 88% I/O wait time yet no visible signs of
> > progress. I've confirmed I'm using the CFQ scheduler, so that's not
> > the problem.
> > 
> 
> Did you also 
> 
> echo 1 > /sys/block/sd{a,b}/device/queue_depth
I have been using this in some of my measurements (this is recorded, of
course).

> echo 1 > /sys/block/sd{a,b}/queue/iosched/slice_async_rq
> echo 1 > /sys/block/sd{a,b}/queue/iosched/quantum
I haven't been doing this although I will collect a data set with these
parameters set. It would be to compare the effect of this to the default
configuration.

> 
> (replacing sd{a,b} with your actual drives) ?
> 
> It seems to have been part of the factors that helped (along with the
> patch).
> 
> And hopefully you don't have a recent Seagate hard drive like me ? :-)
Thankfully, no.

> 
> So you test case is :
> - start a large dd with 1M block size
> - time evolution
> 
I've been using evolution to get a rough idea of the performance of the
configurations but not as a benchmark per se. I have some pretty
good-sized maildirs, so launching evolution for the first time can be
quite a task, IO-wise. Also, switching between folders used to be quite
time consuming. It seems like the patch did help a bit on this front
though.

For a quantitative benchmark I've been using the fio job that you posted
earlier. I've been collecting results and should have a pretty good data
set soon.

I'll send out a compilation of all the data I've collected as soon as
I've finished.

- Ben





  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-21  6:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-17  0:44 [ltt-dev] [Regression] High latency when doing large I/O Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-17 16:26 ` [ltt-dev] [RFC PATCH] block: Fix bio merge induced high I/O latency Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-17 16:50   ` Leon Woestenberg
2009-01-17 17:15     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-17 19:04   ` Jens Axboe
2009-01-18 21:12     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-18 21:27       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-19 18:26       ` Jens Axboe
2009-01-20  2:10         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-20  7:37           ` Jens Axboe
2009-01-20 12:28             ` Jens Axboe
2009-01-20 14:22               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-20 14:24                 ` Jens Axboe
2009-01-20 15:42                   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-20 23:06                     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-20 23:27               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-21  0:25                 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-21  4:38                   ` Ben Gamari
2009-01-21  4:54                     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-21  6:17                       ` Ben Gamari [this message]
2009-01-22 22:59                   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-23  3:21                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-01-23  4:03                   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-02-10  3:36                   ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH] mm fix page writeback accounting to fix oom condition under heavy I/O Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-02-10  3:55                     ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-10  5:23                     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-10  5:56                       ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-10  6:12                       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-02-02  2:08               ` [ltt-dev] [RFC PATCH] block: Fix bio merge induced high I/O latency Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-02-02 11:26                 ` Jens Axboe
2009-02-03  0:46                   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-20 13:45             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-20 20:22             ` Ben Gamari
2009-01-20 22:23               ` Ben Gamari
2009-01-20 23:05                 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-22  2:35               ` Ben Gamari
2009-01-19 15:45     ` Nikanth K
2009-01-19 18:23       ` Jens Axboe
2009-01-17 20:03   ` Ben Gamari

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1232518666.3695.68.camel@mercury.localdomain \
    --to=bgamari@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox