From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15334 invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2003 07:07:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15327 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2003 07:07:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mms1.broadcom.com) (63.70.210.58) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 20 Feb 2003 07:07:06 -0000 Received: from 63.70.210.1 by mms1.broadcom.com with ESMTP (Broadcom MMS1 SMTP Relay (MMS v5.5.0)); Wed, 19 Feb 2003 23:06:45 -0700 Received: from mail-sj1-5.sj.broadcom.com (mail-sj1-5.sj.broadcom.com [10.16.128.236]) by mon-irva-11.broadcom.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA27468; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 23:06:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from dt-sj3-118.sj.broadcom.com (dt-sj3-118 [10.21.64.118]) by mail-sj1-5.sj.broadcom.com (8.12.4/8.12.4/SSF) with ESMTP id h1K771ER013774; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 23:07:01 -0800 (PST) Received: (from cgd@localhost) by dt-sj3-118.sj.broadcom.com ( 8.9.1/SJ8.9.1) id XAA20197; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 23:06:53 -0800 (PST) To: ac131313@redhat.com cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [maint] Drop sim/mips maintainership References: <3E5454FA.7000900@redhat.com> From: cgd@broadcom.com Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 07:07:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: ac131313@redhat.com's message of "Thu, 20 Feb 2003 04:04:59 +0000 (UTC)" Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-WSS-ID: 124AA10F1235790-01-01 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00396.txt.bz2 At Thu, 20 Feb 2003 04:04:59 +0000 (UTC), "Andrew Cagney" wrote: > Chris, "Uh oh..." > I'm about to start submitting a very large number of MIPS simulators. > One is called the `r5900'. Given the clear conflict of interest here > (RHAT vs FSF) I'd rather drop MIPS maintenance and, instead, submit this > as a normal developer Obviously, if you think you have cause for concern about conflict of interest, best that you do what you feel is appropriate. However, this makes me wonder: do you think _I_ should feel concerned about conflict of interest regarding contributing/merging SB-1 and related simulator changes? If so, well, who's left maintaining the MIPS sim? 8-) I think it's quite appropriate for the maintainer to be an active developer (and contributor), with an interest in making the simulator better and more featureful, FWIW. > (I should really drop MIPS maintenance anyway, but > now is a good oportunity :-). *sigh* you have much more experience than I, obviously, so this is a loss, but I understand that you're probably over-stretched. > (yes, must remember to transfer the remaining (C) files as well). yes! 8-) chris