From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7165 invoked by alias); 17 Sep 2003 15:36:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7158 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2003 15:36:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hawaii.kealia.com) (209.3.10.89) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Sep 2003 15:36:10 -0000 Received: by hawaii.kealia.com (Postfix, from userid 2049) id 7BB35CB2D; Wed, 17 Sep 2003 08:36:09 -0700 (PDT) To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , ezannoni@redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: 6.0 NEWS; tls tests on gdb-6? References: <200309112358.h8BNwjjZ010615@duracef.shout.net> <3F611DAE.5020708@redhat.com> From: David Carlton Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 15:36:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <3F611DAE.5020708@redhat.com> (Andrew Cagney's message of "Thu, 11 Sep 2003 21:13:18 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00208.txt.bz2 On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 21:13:18 -0400, Andrew Cagney said: > BTW, there are a few 6.0 features that need to be advertized: > - C++ improvements? I wouldn't advertise the C++ stuff: what's in 6.0 won't make a difference to users. It's not really going to make a difference until nested type support gets fully implemented, and that isn't even in the mainline yet, let alone 6.0. David Carlton carlton@kealia.com